A legal expert has claimed that President Donald Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated when former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus refused to disclose the underlying crime that Trump was accused of, Fox News reported.
The expert, Professor John Bragg of Georgetown University, argued that Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser was violated when Priebus refused to disclose the underlying crime. Bragg argued that the lack of disclosure could have a chilling effect on the President’s ability to defend himself in court.
The underlying crime in question is a civil suit brought against Trump by a woman who accused him of sexual assault.
Professor Bragg’s argument has been met with mixed reactions. Some legal experts believe that Trump’s Sixth Amendment rights were indeed violated, while others argue that the lack of disclosure does not amount to a violation of the amendment.
Regardless of the outcome of this debate, it is important to remember that the Sixth Amendment provides an important protection for individuals accused of a crime. It guarantees the right to confront one’s accuser and to be informed of the charges against them.
For those interested in learning more about this fact check, our mobile app is available for download on the app and google play store by clicking this link, https://dbunk.com/pre-order. The app provides detailed fact-check analysis on the news article and gives readers the opportunity to make an informed decision on the validity of the article.