Fact Check Analysis

Biden Warns the US Risks Becoming an ‘Oligarchy’

Submitted by one of our vigilant subscribers, this fact check request addresses an Associated Press article titled Biden warns the US risks becoming an ‘oligarchy.’ What does the term mean? which was published on January 16, 2025. The DBUNK investigative team carefully analyzed the claims and contextual validity of this article to shine a light on potential misinformation and the nuances of the arguments presented.

Analysis of the Misinformation and Missing Context

In the article, President Joe Biden’s warning about the U.S. becoming an “oligarchy” is explored, but significant misinformation and missing context distort the narrative and may confuse readers seeking clarity. Below is our detailed breakdown:

1. Misrepresentation of Biden’s Criticism and Silicon Valley Donations

The article claims Biden “equated this moment” with historically brutal regimes by invoking the term “oligarchy” but fails to provide sufficient context about this comparison. While he did use the term to indicate growing inequality and the concentration of power in the hands of America’s wealthiest, the statement that he directly equated the U.S. to regimes such as South Africa’s apartheid or post-Soviet Russia is not backed by evidence from his farewell address. This overstated comparison misrepresents Biden’s intent and exaggerates the alarmist tone of his rhetoric.

Additionally, the mention of donations by tech leaders including Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk to President-elect Donald Trump is presented with an implication that this signifies undue influence or direct steps toward oligarchic control. However, Biden’s critique extends beyond these specific instances and encompasses systemic challenges such as lobbying power, wealth disparities, and political financing across both parties. The article omits this broader context, which is critical to understanding Biden’s warning.

2. Misleading Use of Historical Comparisons

The article draws parallels between the potential U.S. oligarchy and historical oligarchies like the post-Soviet Russian oligarch system, the apartheid-era South African racial oligarchy, and the Philippines under powerful economic families. While these examples may academically illustrate the characteristics of oligarchies, comparing the U.S. as of 2025 to such regimes is an oversimplification. None of these examples encapsulate the complexities of a Western liberal democracy like the United States, where checks and balances—however flawed—differ significantly from politically unstable or authoritarian governments.

While it’s legitimate to analyze trends such as wealth inequality, the article’s statement that Biden’s use of the term directly likens the U.S. to countries like Russia risks misleading readers into thinking there is a stronger equivalence than exists in practice. The article also fails to clarify that oligarchy is a spectrum, not an absolute, and one system can have oligarchic tendencies without fully transitioning to an oligarchy resembling those in the cited examples.

Answering Reader Questions

How Fair is it to Compare the U.S. to Historical Oligarchies Like Russia or South Africa?

Your question is a valid one and highlights a key flaw in the article. Comparing the U.S. to post-Soviet Russia or apartheid South Africa is, at best, an exaggeration and, at worst, a fear-inducing tactic. While Biden’s warning should spark a sober conversation about the growing influence of the ultra-wealthy and corporate lobbying, the U.S. remains a democracy with institutional safeguards like transparent elections (albeit imperfect) and a free press. The situations in Russia and South Africa evolved under conditions of political upheaval and weak institutions, making them inappropriate benchmarks for the U.S.

However, Biden’s concern about wealth concentration is not unfounded. Organizations such as Oxfam have noted the widening wealth gap globally, and political scientists have warned that such trends erode democratic norms. While oligarchy is not an imminent threat in the context of U.S. governance, vigilance around undue influence through campaign donations and lobbying is essential to maintaining democratic health.

Conclusion

The Associated Press article raises an important and timely issue, but it falters in its messaging by amplifying alarmist claims and omitting crucial context. While the risk of oligarchic influence in U.S. politics exists, especially as mega-donors play growing roles in campaign financing, equating these dynamics to authoritarian oligarchies elsewhere is both misleading and reductive. Readers should approach the article with caution and a critical eye, understanding that issues like wealth inequality and political influence operate on a continuum rather than being a binary transformation to oligarchy.

As misinformation grows more pervasive and narratives become harder to parse, the DBUNK app bridges the gap between complex stories and factual clarity. Our platform will help you stay informed and empowered to combat the misinformation that fuels modern skepticism and division.

DBUNK is launching soon—stay tuned and join us on our journey to fight misinformation together!