“`html

Fact Check: Did Trump Restore TikTok After Its U.S. Shutdown?

At DBUNK, one of our valued subscribers submitted this article for review, asking us to verify the story and uncover the strings pulled behind TikTok’s swift return to U.S. users. Let’s dig into the facts and separate truth from fiction. You too can submit articles for fact-checking via our upcoming DBUNK app.

Preliminary Analysis

The CNN article, titled “TikTok is back online after Trump pledged to restore it,” presents claims that Donald Trump’s promise to issue an executive order resulted in the swift restoration of TikTok after its temporary shutdown. While the article offers a detailed narrative, many statements lack key context or contain misleading implications that require dissection.

Claim: Trump’s Actions Directly Restored TikTok

One of the article’s core claims is that President-elect Donald Trump’s promise to issue an executive order promptly led TikTok’s U.S. operations to resume. For example, TikTok’s statement attributed to Trump reads, “Thanks for your patience and support. As a result of President Trump’s efforts, TikTok is back in the U.S.!”

Fact Check: This claim oversimplifies the situation and introduces several misleading factors. Firstly, as the article correctly notes later on, Donald Trump has not yet been inaugurated and thus has no official authority to act as president. Promises to issue an executive order are not legally binding or actionable until a president is seated and the order is formally signed. Furthermore, other elements — such as TikTok’s agreements with service providers (like Apple and Google) — likely played an even more prominent role in restoring the app.

In simpler terms, the restoration of TikTok’s availability may have been influenced by other behind-the-scenes negotiations or legal clarifications, rather than being directly tied to Trump’s announcement.

Claim: Trump Can Reverse an Existing Law with an Executive Order

The article states that Trump plans to issue an executive order to stop the enforcement of a bipartisan law banning TikTok. It’s worth examining this claim closely, as headlines like these can raise unrealistic expectations among the public.

Fact Check: Trump’s claim is a legal half-truth. While the president does have executive power to defer or shape the enforcement of certain regulations, he cannot simply override or repeal a law passed by Congress and signed by a sitting president. Barring the implementation of a law such as the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act” would require either formal legislative action or substantive legal authorization. Without such steps, this action remains a temporary band-aid rather than a permanent solution.

The Issue of Bipartisan Support for the Ban

The article paints a somewhat incomplete picture of the bipartisan support that propelled the initial TikTok ban. It accurately mentions that “Congress passed the law with strong bipartisan support,” but downplays the significance by focusing overly on Trump’s efforts to postpone the law’s enforcement.

In reality, the law passed because of escalating national security concerns regarding data harvesting and the Chinese government’s access to private U.S. user information. Any delay or temporary adjustment to the law will likely draw fierce criticism from both Democratic and Republican legislators, as illustrated by the statements of Senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts, who reiterated that TikTok’s connection to ByteDance threatens American privacy.

Claim: TikTok’s Shutdown Was Entirely Out of ByteDance’s Hands

The article repeatedly implies that TikTok was shut down solely due to enforcement signals from partners such as Apple, Google, and Oracle. For example, it states, “TikTok’s message said… multiple critical service providers indicated to TikTok that they were concerned the ban might be enforced.”

Fact Check: ByteDance likely had more agency in the situation than depicted. It’s plausible that the shutdown acted as a strategic move by TikTok to bolster public sympathy, amplify backlash against the ban, and frame Trump as a savior. This narrative is supported by ByteDance’s quick willingness to restore services after Trump’s nonbinding announcement, signaling the maneuver as calculated rather than unavoidable.

What Strings Were Really Pulled?

While the article focuses heavily on Trump’s statements, it downplays TikTok’s intensive behind-the-scenes negotiations with U.S.-based companies and legal teams to resolve its technical issues. Statements from companies like Oracle and legal proceedings were not sufficiently analyzed to highlight their role in the turnaround timeline.

Concluding Thoughts

While it is evident that statements from Trump contributed to TikTok’s rapid restoration, the article overstates the president-elect’s direct influence and fails to account for broader complexities, such as legal maneuvers, ongoing negotiations with ByteDance, and private sector roles. Readers should approach coverage claiming single-person responsibility for such swift outcomes with caution. TikTok’s future in the United States involves multi-dimensional legal and political hurdles that no single executive order can resolve.

Curious about the full breakdown? Stay informed with precise, unbiased fact-checking by downloading the DBUNK mobile app soon!

Original Article Link: CNN Article

“`