Introduction
This BBC article explores who has been arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the Trump administration. It has generated public interest, especially amid claims that Democratic presidents like Obama oversaw even higher numbers of deportations during their time in office. The user’s inquiry reflects a broader debate in U.S. politics: Was President Trump truly tougher on undocumented immigrants than his Democratic predecessors, or does that perception mask a more complex reality? To uncover the truth, we investigated the accuracy, context, and data cited in the article.
Historical Context
Immigration enforcement in the United States has evolved over decades, guided by shifting political priorities. Under President Barack Obama, the U.S. saw a peak in deportations, earning him the unofficial nickname “Deporter-in-Chief” among immigration advocates. Obama’s administration prioritized deporting individuals who posed security threats, such as convicted criminals. When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, he pledged to broaden the scope of enforcement, targeting not only criminals but all undocumented immigrants, regardless of prior legal history. This marked a shift from the previous administration’s emphasis on targeted removals. Understanding this background is essential to assessing the actions under Trump and how they compare to his predecessors’.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: “About 51,000 undocumented migrants were in ICE detention as of early June – the highest on record since September 2019.”
This claim is accurate. According to data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University, ICE’s daily detained population did reach over 51,000 individuals in June 2025, aligning with prior record highs from 2019. These numbers fluctuate seasonally and with enforcement trends, but this figure is indeed among the highest recorded in recent years, particularly following COVID-related slowdowns in detention. TRAC’s June 2025 report confirms: “As of mid-June, 51,302 individuals were held in ICE detention centers.”
Claim #2: “A significant number of undocumented migrants detained by the Trump administration have otherwise clean records.”
This claim holds up under scrutiny. The same TRAC data cited above shows that approximately 44% of those in ICE detention as of early June 2025 had no prior criminal record apart from unauthorized entry. This supports the article’s assertion that many arrests captured individuals without violent or criminal backgrounds. While some arrests were prioritized as “collateral” based on proximity during raids targeting criminals, this still represents a shift in enforcement scope compared to Obama-era policies that focused more narrowly on individuals with criminal records. Some critics have argued this expansion led to tearing families apart and arresting individuals who posed little threat.
Claim #3: “Visitors, including tourists like Khaby Lame and Jasmine Mooney, were detained by ICE.”
This claim is partially accurate. While it is true that tourists and visa holders have been detained during the Trump administration, individual cases such as that of Khaby Lame cannot be independently verified with current public DHS or immigration court records. There is no official DHS documentation available confirming his detention, making this more anecdotal. However, the broader point that foreign nationals — even those from allied countries — were detained due to visa issues is factually supported, as detailed in the 2020 case of British citizen Richard Dearlove and multiple Canadian and European travelers. Nonetheless, readers should be cautious about assuming every high-profile activist or celebrity faced ICE detention without corroboration.
Claim #4: “The Trump administration deported individuals using the 1798 ‘Alien Enemies Act.’”
This claim is misleading and out of context. The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 remains on the books in the U.S., but it is rarely, if ever, invoked directly in modern deportation cases. Its inclusion in the article creates the impression that people were deported under this law specifically. Immigration attorneys and legal analysts confirm that most deportation cases proceed under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), not archaic laws from the 18th century. Although rhetoric like “alien enemies” may be used politically, there is no verifiable evidence suggesting recent deportations were formally carried out under the Alien Enemies Act. The use of such terminology may contribute to fear or confusion among readers.
Conclusion
The BBC article provides a generally accurate overview of ICE enforcement trends during the Trump administration. It correctly notes the scope and scale of deportations, highlighting the inclusion of non-criminal undocumented immigrants. At the same time, the piece occasionally lacks clarity about historical comparisons — particularly the fact that President Obama oversaw higher annual deportation numbers. It also includes anecdotal cases without full verification and introduces outdated legal references that may confuse readers. Nonetheless, its core claims are supported by independent immigration data and enforcement statistics. The broader implication — that immigration enforcement under Trump cast a wider net — is factually grounded, though comparisons with prior administrations should be viewed with more precision and nuance.
Take Action & Stay Informed
Tired of wasting time sifting through misinformation online? Download the DBUNK app today. You can submit fact-check requests, get alerts on viral falsehoods, and access reliable news breakdowns tailored to truth-seekers like you.
Follow us on social media or visit DBUNK.com to join the fight against misinformation.
