Fact Check Analysis: Did President Biden Issue Preemptive Pardons to Family Members in His Final Moments as President?

This fact check has been brought to you by a DBUNK subscriber who submitted a request for verification. You too can submit your fact-checking requests for free through our platform, where misinformation meets clarity.

The article in question, published by ABC News on January 20, 2025, asserts that former President Joe Biden issued preemptive pardons to several family members during the last moments of his presidency. Given the sensitive nature of the accusations and the explosive claims about politically motivated investigations, our team at DBUNK LLC carefully reviewed the contents of this article against independent sources, historical practices, and legal context.

Key Findings

Misinformation Alert: Misrepresentation of Legal Context Surrounding Preemptive Pardons

The article paints Biden’s actions as an outlier or inherently suspicious, but fails to address the historical use of preemptive pardons in U.S. politics. High-profile preemptive pardons are legally permissible and not unprecedented. Past presidents, including Gerald Ford (pardon of Richard Nixon), Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump, have issued such pardons controversially. The omission of this context may lead readers to believe such actions are extraordinary or imply inherent wrongdoing.

Incorrect Framing: Acceptance of a Pardon vs. Admission of Guilt

The article notes Biden’s statements that the issuance and acceptance of a pardon are not admissions of guilt but fails to emphasize that this particular nuance is rooted in the Supreme Court case of Burdick v. United States (1915). The case established that accepting a pardon is not a confession of guilt. By underexplaining this, readers may conflate the act of pardoning with the presumption of wrongdoing, a subtle yet significant framing misstep in the article.

Missing Context: Status of Allegations Against Biden Family Members

The article emphasizes Republican-led allegations against James Biden and others but provides no corroborating evidence. While it accurately reports that Republicans claim James Biden provided misleading information to Congress about his brother’s business involvement, it fails to convey that no formal charges have been filed in these cases as of the time of the article. By omitting this detail, the reader might erroneously infer that there is substantial evidence of wrongdoing when the claims remain unproven.

Biased Language and Implications

The language used in the article, particularly quotes from vocal Republican officials like James Comer, is predictably adversarial but lacks counterbalance from independent experts or Democratic perspectives. For example, Comer describes the pardons as a “confession of corruption,” a subjective and factually unsupported claim presented without rebuttal or alternative viewpoints. The absence of balanced reporting may feed partisan bias rather than providing a full spectrum of understanding about the issue.

Answering the Reader’s Question

Why did Biden feel the need to issue preemptive pardons for his family members if they’ve allegedly done nothing wrong?

The article posits Biden’s rationale as protecting his family from “unrelenting attacks and threats.” Historically, preemptive pardons have been granted to safeguard individuals from politically charged investigations rather than to shield actual criminal behavior. Biden’s statement alludes to this reasoning, noting that baseless investigations often damage reputations and cause financial strain. Whether or not Biden’s family members were at risk of legal jeopardy remains uncertain without external corroboration, amplifying the importance of reviewing facts before jumping to conclusions.

Conclusion

While the ABC News article provides an accurate summary of Biden’s actions and Republican reactions, it falls short in explaining key legal principles, omits broader historical context, and allows partisan opinions to dominate what should be an impartial report. Readers are urged to approach such politically charged topics critically and seek out additional sources for a fuller picture.

For a deeper dive into our fact-checking methods and tools, or to submit your own requests for analysis, visit DBUNK today. Our newest mobile app is launching soon, designed to provide clarity in an era of misinformation.