Introduction
This article was flagged due to conflicting medical claims made by former President Joe Biden and his office regarding his recent cancer diagnosis. Readers are especially concerned about a discrepancy between Biden asserting that the cancer “hasn’t penetrated” his organs or bones while his office had earlier confirmed “metastasis to the bone.” The conflict invites further scrutiny to ensure the accuracy and transparency around health disclosures from public figures.
Historical Context
Joe Biden has publicly battled personal health challenges in the past, including the tragic death of his son Beau Biden from brain cancer in 2015. Throughout his presidency and political campaign, concerns about Biden’s health, both physical and cognitive, have occasionally emerged in media narratives and political debates. Now, following a public diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer, Biden’s statements are once again under the magnifying glass, particularly given the high level of public interest surrounding elected officials’ medical fitness.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: “It hasn’t penetrated. It’s not in any organ. My bones are strong.”
This statement directly contradicts a prior confirmation from Biden’s office. On May 3, 2025, White House physicians confirmed that President Biden was diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer and that there was evidence of “metastasis to the bone” — meaning the cancer had spread beyond the original site to other parts of the body. (Source: American Cancer Society, NIH)
Medically, “penetration” typically refers to cancer breaching tissue walls or spreading beyond the primary organ to nearby or distant sites. Metastatic involvement of the bone clearly qualifies as penetration and systemic spread. Therefore, Biden’s assertion that cancer “hasn’t penetrated” and is “not in any organ” lacks medical and factual consistency with the statement released by his own team.
Verdict: False. Biden’s comments contradict the official diagnosis of bone metastasis.
Claim #2: “The prognosis is good.”
Prostate cancer generally has high survival rates, particularly when detected early. However, when prostate cancer metastasizes — particularly to bones — it shifts from a localized condition to a Stage IV diagnosis, substantially affecting long-term prognosis. According to the American Cancer Society, the 5-year relative survival rate for prostate cancer that has spread to distant parts of the body is approximately 32%.
While advancements in treatment may improve quality of life and longevity, the term “good prognosis” may oversimplify a complex condition. That said, oncologists sometimes use the phrase positively if response to initial treatments is promising or if the patient maintains functional health despite the diagnosis.
Verdict: Misleading. While an optimistic prognosis may reflect a hopeful personal attitude, describing it as “good” ignores the seriousness of late-stage, metastatic prostate cancer.
Claim #3: “One of the leading surgeons in the world is working with me.”
This claim lacks any publicly verifiable evidence. Biden does not name the surgeon or provide any specific affiliations with globally ranked oncology institutions such as MD Anderson, Dana-Farber, or Sloan Kettering. While it’s plausible that high-profile officials receive care from top-tier specialists, the vagueness of the statement prevents independent confirmation or rejection.
Verdict: Insufficient evidence. Without specifics, this claim cannot be independently verified.
Claim #4: “I’m mentally incompetent and I can’t walk” (stated sarcastically)
Though Biden’s statement was offered jokingly in response to criticism about his mental and physical faculties, it still touches on an ongoing political narrative amplified by both media and opponents. Health experts emphasize that sarcasm should not substitute for transparency in medical communication.
Nonetheless, Biden’s medical records — as released in the 2023 White House physician’s report — indicated he was “fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency.” There have been no verified medical reports suggesting incompetence or neurological decline, although questions persist.
Verdict: Misleading context. The comment was a sarcastic retort, not a factual claim. However, it risks trivializing legitimate public concern about leadership health.
Conclusion
The ABC News article presents a generally accurate overview of Biden’s recent public appearance and Memorial Day remarks. However, it significantly fails to reconcile a major inconsistency regarding his cancer diagnosis. Biden’s statements that the cancer “hasn’t penetrated” and is not in any organs directly conflict with the medically significant announcement from his own office confirming metastasis to the bone. This distinction is not minor; it suggests either a misunderstanding by the former president or an attempt to downplay the seriousness of his condition. While ABC News reports both Biden’s words and the statement from his office, it does not clarify the contradiction, leaving readers confused on a critical issue.
Encourage Readers to Take Action
Want to know the truth faster? Download the free DBUNK app and join thousands of readers fighting misinformation. Stay updated, informed, and empowered.
