Introduction
The article covering Joe Biden’s first public statements following his prostate cancer diagnosis has raised concerns due to apparent contradictions between Biden’s personal remarks and official statements from his office. Most notably, Biden claimed that the cancer had not “penetrated,” whereas his office stated there was “metastasis to the bone.” This fact-check investigates the accuracy of such claims, and analyzes whether the discrepancy suggests misinformation, miscommunication, or requires further scrutiny.
Historical Context
Joe Biden’s health has long been a point of political curiosity and criticism, amplified during and after his presidency. Biden previously underwent treatment for minor cancers, including the removal of melanoma. Healthcare disclosures, particularly regarding cancer, are considered a standard electoral protocol for candidates and officeholders. However, around cancer and cognitive capacity, new pressures have emerged, especially in an era of heightened political polarization and digital misinformation. Transparency becomes crucial in the public’s ability to assess leadership capability, making contradictions around any diagnosis particularly sensitive.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: Biden said “It hasn’t penetrated… it’s not in any organ. My bones are strong.”
This claim, made during Biden’s public remarks, stands in apparent contradiction to prior medical disclosures. According to the White House’s original statement shared on May 12, 2025, physicians confirmed that Biden’s prostate cancer had metastasized to his pelvic bone. Bone metastasis occurs when cancer cells spread from their original site to the bone and is, by definition, a form of cancer penetration beyond the primary organ.
Therefore, Biden’s claim that the cancer “hasn’t penetrated” and “is not in any organ” is inaccurate. Once prostate cancer metastasizes to another part of the body such as bone, it indicates a higher stage or advanced development of the disease (source: American Cancer Society). His reassuring tone may reflect personal optimism, but the language used misrepresents the clinical reality.
Claim #2: Biden said, “The expectation is, we’re going to be able to beat this.”
Biden’s optimistic prognosis is a subjective expression and not a verifiable medical assertion. However, asserting a high likelihood of success against “aggressive” prostate cancer with bone metastases requires context. According to the National Cancer Institute, Stage IV prostate cancer (which includes bone metastases) has lower five-year survival rates, though outcomes vary depending on timely treatment, age, and general health condition. Biden, receiving access to elite care and treatment modalities, may be in a better personal position than average patients to manage the disease (source: SEER Cancer Stat Facts).
However, without speaking in medical terms or citing clinical evaluations directly, the phrase “we’re going to beat this” is aspirational rather than factual. This underscores the importance of verifying prognosis claims with physicians or official reports rather than relying solely on patient statements.
Claim #3: Biden’s office said the cancer “had metastasized to the bone.”
This claim is accurate. On May 12, 2025, in a statement provided by White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor, Biden’s team confirmed that testing revealed “evidence of prostate cancer metastasized to the pelvic bone.” The medical terminology used denotes Stage IV prostate cancer. This kind of spread notably differs from cancer that is “localized” within the prostate (source: National Library of Medicine).
Compared to Biden’s personal denial that the cancer had “penetrated,” this medical description confirms that the extent of the illness is more severe than he characterized. The term “metastasis” cannot be reconciled with “hasn’t penetrated” in a medical context, suggesting his public statement misrepresented the actual diagnosis, intentionally or otherwise.
Conclusion
The article largely reports on Biden’s remarks about his cancer treatment, mental fitness, and Memorial Day speech. While the reporting itself does not inject bias or mislead readers, the discrepancy between Biden’s public claim that the cancer “hasn’t penetrated” and the official medical disclosure that it had metastasized to his bone is a legitimate cause for concern. The article mentions both statements but does not resolve the contradiction or clarify the implications. While this could have been an inadvertent misstatement by Biden, the article’s lack of context may leave readers confused or misinformed about the seriousness of his condition.
Additionally, no evidence suggests that ABC News manipulated any quotes, but by citing both Biden’s remarks and his office’s statement without expert clarification, the article presents contradictory information side by side without reconciliation. This omission of medical commentary creates a potential for misunderstanding among readers unfamiliar with oncology terminology.
Encourage Readers to Take Action
If you’re ever unsure about the facts behind headlines, DBUNK is here to help. Download our app or follow us on social media to access unbiased truth checks and submit your own article for verification—completely free.
Link to Original Article
Read the original ABC News article here
