Examining the Accuracy of Claims About Biden’s Autopen Signatures
A recent report from the Heritage Foundation-backed Oversight Project claims that President Joe Biden’s official documents were signed using an autopen, raising questions about who was actually in charge of policy decisions. The report has gained traction among critics of the former president, but does it hold up to scrutiny? Let’s break down the claims.
The History of Autopen Usage in Government
The autopen, a device that replicates handwritten signatures, has been used by U.S. presidents for decades. Presidents such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump have all authorized its use for signing official documents. The practice is legal and has been acknowledged publicly, particularly for routine or high-volume signings where a president’s direct involvement is not required.
Fact-Checking the Key Claims
Claim #1: “All of Biden’s official documents used an autopen signature, except for his announcement dropping out of the race.”
Analysis of Biden’s signed documents confirms the presence of an autopen signature on many executive orders. However, Fox News’ own report also noted that President Donald Trump’s signed documents displayed the same consistency in signature. While this does raise transparency concerns, it does not conclusively suggest that Biden was not aware of policy decisions. Furthermore, no legal requirement exists that mandates presidents must personally sign all official documents by hand.
Claim #2: “Whoever controlled the autopen controlled the presidency.”
This statement is speculative and lacks supporting evidence. The use of an autopen does not mean the president did not authorize documents. Previous presidents, including Obama and Bush, also delegated the use of autopens for efficiency. Without verified proof that Biden was unaware or uninvolved in decisions, this claim remains unproven.
Claim #3: “Speaker Johnson claimed Biden did not remember signing a policy freezing LNG exports.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s anecdote about Biden allegedly forgetting a policy decision cannot be independently verified. Given Biden’s documented use of an autopen, it is possible he did not physically sign the pause order on LNG exports. However, memory lapses do not equate to a lack of presidential authority. Without concrete evidence beyond Johnson’s recollection, this claim remains uncertain.
Final Verdict: Speculation Without Definitive Proof
While it is true that Biden heavily relied on an autopen for signing documents, this practice is not unique to his presidency. The article frames the issue in a way that suggests a deeper conspiracy without offering definitive proof of wrongdoing. The investigation into Biden’s mental fitness provides additional context but does not conclusively prove that policies were enacted without his knowledge. Thus, the article presents valid concerns but leans on speculation rather than concrete evidence.
Get Involved and Stay Informed
Want to fact-check more articles like this? Download the DBUNK app today and ensure you’re getting accurate news.
Read the original article here
