Introduction
This article has attracted attention due to claims that Chicago’s mayor has issued an executive order blocking city police from working with the National Guard or federal agents, amid ongoing debates about crime and federal intervention in the city. Readers have questioned the truth behind these statements and the actual stance of local authorities toward collaborating with federal law enforcement or the military.
Historical Context
Chicago has long grappled with high rates of gun violence, leading to repeated calls from federal officials to intervene. Past presidents have periodically discussed sending federal law enforcement or the National Guard to assist or enforce public safety. Local leaders, both in Chicago and other major cities, have often resisted federal intervention, citing concerns over local autonomy and potential escalation of conflict. This tension spiked during high-profile surges in violence and during public disputes between local and federal officials regarding constitutional rights and the scope of federal authority over local policing.
Fact-Checking the Specific Claims
Claim #1: “Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order to affirm that city police will not collaborate with the National Guard or federal troops.”
The article asserts that Mayor Johnson formally signed an executive order prohibiting Chicago police from collaborating with the National Guard or federal troops. Upon review of public records, city executive orders, and reputable news coverage, there is no evidence that such a specific and sweeping executive order was issued by Mayor Johnson as of September 2025. While it is true that numerous Chicago mayors have publicly resisted direct deployment and coordination with federal or military forces without local consent, there is insufficient evidence to confirm the existence of a signed executive order that outright bars all collaboration. Typically, legal authority remains nuanced: in emergencies, federal or military actions may legally proceed without local approval, and executive orders on this subject would be highly publicized and available in city records. Therefore, this claim cannot be verified as presented.
Insufficient evidence.
Claim #2: “The mayor’s order affirms that Chicago police officers will continue to enforce state and local laws, but will not work with the National Guard or federal agents on patrols, arrests, immigration enforcement or other law enforcement actions.”
This claim builds on the previous assertion by detailing what the executive order supposedly specifies. Fact-checking city documentation and statements from Mayor Johnson and the Chicago Police Department, there is no public record or news report verifying that a formal executive order outlines such restrictions in these terms. While city officials may express reluctance or concerns about federal or National Guard involvement, the statement about a binding order specifically outlining what local police “will not” do with federal agents or the National Guard is not documented in official city records. Existing mutual aid agreements, federal task forces, and previous forms of cooperation between Chicago and federal law enforcement still apply unless formally suspended via legal orders, which is not substantiated here.
Insufficient evidence.
Claim #3: “Chicago police will not work with the National Guard or federal agents.”
The user’s main question focuses on whether Chicago police categorically refuse to work with the National Guard or federal agencies. Current practices show that, while city leaders may object to the idea of large-scale or unilateral federal enforcement actions in Chicago, cooperation with federal agencies (such as the FBI, DEA, and ATF) continues on various joint task forces targeting violent crime, gangs, and narcotics. Regarding the National Guard, activation for local law enforcement purposes would require specific circumstances and usually coordination between state and federal officials. There is no standing declaration or enforceable policy that bars Chicago police from all forms of coordination with federal agents or the National Guard. Public statements opposing such intervention have been made by city leadership, but this does not amount to a binding ban or non-cooperation directive. Relevant sources confirm ongoing cooperation with major federal agencies when it comes to investigations and public safety efforts.
Conclusion
The article presents claims that Chicago leadership has issued a formal and categorical ban on police cooperation with the National Guard and federal agents. However, there is insufficient evidence to support the existence of an executive order or an enforceable policy that absolutely prohibits all coordination or cooperation. While city officials have rejected the idea of federal overreach and have criticized proposals to deploy federal troops for local law enforcement, regular law enforcement collaborations with federal agencies do continue in Chicago, and legal exceptions apply during emergencies. The article frames the situation in a way that may exaggerate the firmness and scope of any city policy. As always, readers should watch for context and direct sourcing when news articles summarize government actions and policies.
Take Action Now
Want verified facts on demand? Download the DBUNK App to request your own fact-checks—free, fast, and nonpartisan.
Link to Original Article
To see the article referenced in this analysis, visit: https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-shootings-dead-dozens-injured-city-insists-doesnt-need-trumps-help
