Introduction
This article has been flagged for fact-checking due to claims about China’s rare earth export controls and their impact on global defense and trade. Additionally, readers want to know if the United States has domestic capacity to mine and process rare earth metals, a question with rising geopolitical importance.
Historical Context
Rare earth elements are a group of minerals critical for advanced electronics, renewable energy, and national defense technology. For years, China has dominated the global rare-earth market, controlling much of the extraction, processing, and manufacturing. Supply disruptions in the past—such as the 2010 Sino-Japanese dispute—have prompted the U.S., EU, and allied countries to seek ways to reduce dependence on China, spurring investment in alternative sources and technologies.
Fact-Check: Specific Claims
Claim #1: The United States has the capability to mine and process rare earth metals domestically.
Research confirms that the United States is actively developing domestic rare earth capabilities. USA Rare Earth is constructing a major magnet manufacturing facility in Oklahoma, planned to commence commercial production in 2026 with a target output of 5,000 tonnes of magnets per year. American Rare Earths is pushing forward with the Halleck Creek project in Wyoming, one of the world’s largest rare earth resources. These projects are supported by advanced research into new extraction and processing methods, indicating significant progress but not yet at full scale comparable to China. The claim that the U.S. can mine and process rare earths domestically is accurate for early-stage capability, with expansion underway. [Source] [Source]
Claim #2: China controls more than 70% of rare earth mining, 90% of processing, and 93% of magnet manufacturing globally.
This claim is fully supported by the most recent data. China’s share of global rare earth output is unmatched, with its control of not only the mining but especially the refining and advanced manufacturing stages. This allows for significant influence over supply chains for technologies ranging from smartphones to advanced missiles. [Source]
Claim #3: China’s new restrictions are among its most consequential actions affecting U.S. defense supply chains.
The article states, “the newly announced restrictions represent China’s most consequential measures to date targeting the defense sector.” This is corroborated by experts and think tanks. The latest Chinese measures require export licenses for rare earths and associated technologies, and deny licenses to entities connected to foreign militaries, including the United States. Defense hardware, such as F-35 jets and precision munitions, relies on these materials, putting supply chains at risk. [Source]
Claim #4: The U.S. and Europe are seeking alternative rare earth sources, especially in Central Asia.
The article accurately reports growing U.S. and EU engagement in Central Asia to diversify rare earth sources. Initiatives like the C5+1 Critical Minerals Dialogue and partnerships announced at summits point to a genuine effort. However, context is essential: while Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan have announced new finds, obstacles such as high investment risk, poor infrastructure, and slow development timelines hinder rapid supply diversification. The article does reference these limitations, though readers should note that immediate replacement of Chinese supply remains unrealistic in the short term. [Source]
Conclusion
The article provides an accurate overview of recent developments regarding China’s rare earth exports and global security concerns, with data well-supported by reputable industry and academic sources. It correctly highlights China’s dominant position, the strategic implications of new export controls, and genuine efforts by the U.S. to restore domestic production and seek alternatives abroad. While the article stresses the risks to international supply chains, it does not exaggerate or misrepresent the facts, but readers should note that the U.S. domestic rare earth capability is still in development and not yet at the scale of Chinese production. No critical facts are omitted, and the information provided is consistent with independent research.
Take Action Now
Want to stay informed and help fight misinformation? Download the DBUNK App to fact-check news articles or submit your own requests for free.
Link to Original Article
