Why This Article Was Flagged
Concerns over rising QR code scams—especially those involving mystery packages sent to people’s homes—have sparked alarm. This article was flagged for fact-checking after readers questioned whether criminals mailing out QR code-laden packages means law enforcement is falling behind in preventing high-tech fraud.
Understanding the Rise of QR Code Scams
QR codes quickly became part of daily life during the pandemic and afterward, making payments, restaurant menus, and customer interactions touchless and convenient. This widespread adoption also caught the attention of scammers, who have shifted tactics to exploit QR codes for phishing, malware, and identity theft. Prior to the recent scams involving mailed QR codes, QR fraud most often involved phishing emails, websites, and malicious QR stickers on public surfaces.
Fact-Checking Key Claims from the Article
Claim 1: “Criminals are now mailing out packages that people never ordered. Inside these boxes is a QR code that, when scanned, can lead to stolen personal details, drained bank accounts or malware running silently in the background of a phone.”
The article accurately states that the FBI has warned about unsolicited packages containing QR codes as a form of potential fraud. In August 2025, the FBI issued a public notice warning consumers about this exact scam, describing how criminals send mystery packages with QR codes to trick recipients into visiting phishing sites or downloading malware. Reports of such scams have emerged in several states, and local police departments have issued their own warnings aligned with these observations. The risk of phishing for personal details or installing malware from malicious QR codes is supported by cybersecurity industry findings and advice from major security experts. This claim is accurate and substantiated by authoritative sources.
Claim 2: “The scheme is a twist on what is known as a brushing scam… Traditionally, brushing scams involved online sellers sending products to strangers and then using the recipient’s details to post fake reviews.”
This description of a “brushing scam” is broadly accurate. Brushing scams have historically involved sellers shipping inexpensive items to random names and addresses, then posting fake positive reviews under the recipient’s name to artificially boost sales rankings on commerce platforms. The current version, involving mailings with QR codes and an intent to defraud the recipient directly, signifies a more overtly malicious adaptation. According to the Federal Trade Commission and consumer protection advocacy groups, both versions of the scam have been documented, with the newer variant presenting a substantially higher risk to recipients.
Claim 3: “Once scanned, the code redirects them to fraudulent websites that ask for sensitive personal information, such as banking information, credit card numbers or login credentials. Some codes go a step further and install malicious software designed to track activity and steal data directly from the device.”
The assertion that QR codes can direct users to phishing websites or initiate malware installation is well-supported by security research and real-world cases. Studies from Cisco’s Talos Intelligence Group and the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre confirm that attackers use QR codes as a vector both for phishing attacks and malware payload delivery, especially to mobile devices. There have been documented incidents in which scanning such QR codes led to credential harvesting forms imitating banks, as well as reports of malware disguised as legitimate apps.
Claim 4: “The latest warning from federal authorities shows just how far these tactics have gone.”
This claim is a matter of interpretation, but it is accurate that the escalation to physical mail campaigns using QR codes represents a novel and more aggressive approach. Law enforcement, including the FBI, has indeed increased public communication about cyber-enabled scams as tactics have evolved beyond digital-only vectors. However, implying that this development means law enforcement is “behind the curve” does not reflect the ongoing actions taken to inform the public, track such schemes, and collaborate with private sector partners. While criminals are constantly adapting, this does not suggest law enforcement is unaware or inactive; rather, it reflects the ongoing challenge of evolving cybercrime methods. Multiple federal advisories demonstrate an ongoing response.
Conclusion
The article delivers an accurate summary of the current threat landscape around QR code scams, particularly those involving unsolicited packages. Its identification of the scam’s roots in brushing fraud and the evolution toward more dangerous data-theft tactics is well-supported by federal agency guidance and independent security research. The factual core—concerning the existence of mailed QR code scams and their potential impacts—is reliably presented. There is a subtle editorial framing suggesting law enforcement may be lagging, but official actions, including updated warnings and investigations, counter the idea that authorities are unaware or inactive. Overall, the article provides a clear and accurate overview of this emerging scam, although it could have better balanced the narrative by highlighting recent law enforcement efforts to counteract it.
Take Action Now
Stop misinformation from spreading.
Download the DBUNK App to see fact-checks in real time, flag suspicious news, and empower yourself with trusted information.
Read the Source for Yourself
Curious to review this article? Visit it here:
Original Article
