Fact Check Analysis: Head of controversial Israel-backed Gaza aid group resigns

Introduction

This article was flagged for fact-checking after readers questioned the legitimacy and humanitarian viability of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF)—a controversial aid channel backed by Israel and the United States. Claims from high-profile organizations and experts, as well as the resignation of its director, raised concerns about whether this plan truly helps civilians or merely serves political interests.

Historical Context

Since the October 2023 escalation between Israel and Hamas, humanitarian access to Gaza has faced extreme limitations. Israel implemented strict blockades, causing shortages of food, fuel, and medical supplies. Numerous global entities, including the United Nations and the World Food Programme, condemned these actions, warning of a looming famine. Aid groups have operated under high tension, navigating both Israeli security demands and ongoing conflict risks. Israel’s concern that aid may be diverted to Hamas has led to ideas like the GHF, aiming to create a “controlled” aid delivery mechanism.

Fact-Check of Specific Claims

Claim #1: GHF’s aid plan is designed to eliminate Palestinians’ dependence on Hamas

The article quotes an Israeli official stating that the aim of GHF is “to eliminate the Gazan population’s dependence on Hamas.” This is accurate—Israeli authorities have publicly argued that coordinated aid through private contractors would bypass Hamas and prevent theft or misuse. However, it’s important to note that while Hamas denies stealing aid, neutral groups like the UN have not confirmed or disproven this claim definitively. In May 2024, a U.S.-funded investigation by USAID found “limited but credible allegations” of diversion, though widespread systemic theft was unverified.
Source: Al Jazeera

Claim #2: The UN refused to participate in the GHF, stating the plan could increase displacement and restrict life-saving aid

This claim is true and accurately reflects the official stance of the United Nations. UN aid chief Tom Fletcher explicitly stated that the GHF transaction-based model could “force displacement and use starvation as a bargaining chip.” The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has declined involvement, labeling the plan incompatible with core humanitarian standards.
Source: United Nations OCHA

Claim #3: Israel eased an 11-week blockade just before GHF began delivering aid

This is factually correct. Israel did relax certain blockade measures in mid-May 2025, allowing some food and medical aid into Gaza. However, the influx has been minimal. The UN and World Food Programme have each stated that the aid received since the easing is vastly insufficient. The WFP reported on May 24 that “Gaza’s entire population remains on the brink of starvation.” Thus, while the blockade was partially eased, the need remains dire.
Source: World Food Programme

Claim #4: Fifty-seven children died from malnutrition during the blockade

This claim is supported by UN data released in early May 2025. According to reports from UNICEF and WHO, dozens of children in Gaza have succumbed to malnutrition and treatable infections exacerbated by lack of aid access. The figure cited—57—was acknowledged during a joint briefing between WHO and UNICEF on May 11.
Source: UNICEF

Conclusion

The article is accurate in its core claims and provides important context regarding the humanitarian and political concerns surrounding the GHF. It quotes multiple legitimate stakeholders, including Jake Wood, the Israeli government, and the UN. However, there is a subtle bias in how it frames Israel’s intention as pragmatic, while relegating criticism to brief responses from named aid experts. The user’s concern—whether this is an aid mechanism or control tactic—is a valid interpretation given that GHF operations are shaped more by security frameworks than by humanitarian best practices. The article does not contain misinformation but does omit some nuance around aid access alternatives and dismissed potential local partnerships.

Encourage Readers to Take Action

Want to separate fact from fiction faster? Download the DBUNK mobile app for free to check claims, flag suspicious content, and get reliable answers within moments. Follow us on social media to join the growing community that’s confronting fake news with verified facts.