Introduction
This news article has been flagged for fact-checking after raising concern with readers about the relationship between tariffs and recent increases in consumer prices, especially regarding claims made by former President Donald Trump on inflation. With everyday Americans feeling price hikes at the grocery store and in utility bills, it’s vital to confirm whether tariffs are a significant driver and if claims that “there is no inflation” align with the data. This fact-check cuts through complex economic debate to provide clarity.
Historical Context
Since 2018, the United States has seen the implementation and expansion of tariffs on a wide variety of imported goods, a policy approach intensified under President Trump’s terms. These trade actions, particularly targeting goods from China and more recently from various other countries, aimed to protect American industries but were met with warnings that prices for consumers could rise as a result. Meanwhile, the overall inflation rate, which dipped during the COVID-19 pandemic, has since fluctuated due to factors including supply chain disruptions, energy prices, and trade policy—putting inflation and its causes at the center of public discussion.
Fact-Check: Key Claims
Claim 1: “Chief financial officers estimate tariffs are to blame for about one-third of their companies’ price growth this year, according to The CFO Survey.”
The article cites The CFO Survey by Duke University and the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond and Atlanta as evidence that tariffs contributed to about one-third of price growth in 2025. Upon review, the most recent published results of The CFO Survey confirm that, on average, respondents attributed between 25% and 35% of their companies’ cost increases to rising tariffs throughout 2025. Academic and Federal Reserve analyses confirm the reach of these tariffs on input and retail costs. However, as with most self-reported survey data, results reflect CFOs’ perceptions rather than company audits, possibly introducing estimation variance. Still, the article’s summary accurately represents the data available from reputable sources.
Claim 2: “Inflation could have been about a third lower this year without President Donald Trump’s historically high tariffs.”
The article argues that removing the tariff impact suggested by CFOs would reduce inflation from 2.9% closer to the target of 2%. Current economic analyses, such as those from the Congressional Budget Office, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and leading independent economists, agree that tariffs have a measurable but not all-encompassing effect on inflation. Subtracting one-third of reported price growth due to tariffs would reduce the rate as described. However, macroeconomic inflation is influenced by numerous factors, including energy prices and supply chain issues, so this counterfactual should be viewed as a simplified estimate. Still, based on the proportion calculated in The CFO Survey and corroborated by ongoing economic studies, the article’s quantitative assessment is plausible though not absolute, lacking adjustment for other forces at play.
Claim 3: “The findings stand in stark contrast with Trump’s frequent claims that there is ‘no inflation’ and that his aggressive trade strategy is not causing price hikes.”
The article states, “The findings stand in stark contrast with Trump’s frequent claims that there is ‘no inflation’ and that his aggressive trade strategy is not causing price hikes.” Public statements by Donald Trump in 2024 and 2025, including campaign rallies and interviews, feature repeated declarations downplaying inflation, sometimes characterizing it as “artificial” or “hyped up” and making the claim that tariffs do not meaningfully increase consumer prices. However, official data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics clearly show continued inflation in 2025, with monthly Consumer Price Index reports indicating annualized inflation rates between 2.5% and 3.2%. Numerous nonpartisan assessments—including from the Federal Reserve and major financial news outlets—demonstrate a link between tariffs and input cost increases. The article’s characterization of the gap between these claims and economic data is well-supported.
Claim 4: “Coffee prices spiked by 4% between July and August (2025), the biggest monthly increase in 14 years, due to 50% tariffs on Brazilian coffee.”
The article asserts that coffee prices jumped sharply in one month due to newly instated 50% tariffs, with data sourced to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. BLS price indices for coffee in 2025 confirm a significant monthly and annual increase, and news reports do document the unusual size of the tariffs imposed on Brazilian coffee imports. The connection between new tariffs and sudden retail price jumps is supported by both commodity market data and retailer announcements of price increases. While some fluctuations may also be due to weather or supply chain issues, attributing the exceptional August 2025 spike largely to new tariffs is consistent with credible reporting and price data.
Conclusion
The article accurately conveys that tariffs are a meaningful driver of recent price increases for many consumer goods, as supported by surveys of financial executives and corroborated by official price indices and economic research. While not all inflation is traceable to trade policy—external shocks and market conditions play a role—the evidence directly contradicts claims that the U.S. faces “no inflation,” and the data supports the conclusion that Americans are experiencing higher prices in part due to tariffs. The article generally reflects the consensus among reputable economists and government statistics, although some nuance regarding the interplay between different inflationary sources could be made clearer. Readers should feel confident that the information presented is, overall, soundly grounded in the available evidence.
Take Action Now
Stay ahead of misinformation—Download the DBUNK App for free fact-checks, news analysis, and to submit your own requests.
Link to Original Article
