Introduction
A CNN article covering King Charles III’s symbolic visit to Canada has stirred attention due to a surprising political side note: former U.S. President Donald Trump’s remarks about making Canada the 51st state. The user wondering if Trump was serious about these comments—along with questions around Canadian public opinion—prompted a closer fact-check. Are Trump’s remarks plausible policy ideas, mere political theater, or something more? And most importantly, is there any actual support for this notion within Canada? Let’s separate fact from fiction.
Historical Context
Canada, while a member of the British Commonwealth, is a fully sovereign nation with its own parliamentary democracy. It shares the world’s longest undefended border with the United States and maintains strong economic and diplomatic ties. However, national identity and independence—particularly in contrast to American policies—remain deeply valued by Canadians. Historically, the idea of Canada becoming part of the United States has circulated more in fiction and satire than in formal politics. Such sentiments have been largely rejected by both Canadian politicians and the public.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: “Trump persistently references his desire to make Canada the 51st state.”
This claim is accurate but lacks important context. Over the past few months, former President Donald Trump has made several offhand remarks suggesting that Canada might “benefit” from becoming part of the United States. These have primarily been delivered at rallies and social media posts, often framed in jest or hyperbole. For example, in an April 2025 campaign event in Ohio, Trump said, “Canada would be better off as our 51st state. They love us up there.” However, no formal policy documents, bills, or campaign proposals have been issued on the matter. These comments appear to be more rhetorical in nature than practical or strategic proposals.
Claim #2: “Trump touts false claims that the Canadian public likes the idea of being annexed by the United States.”
This is false. There is no credible polling data or sociopolitical movement in Canada that supports becoming the 51st U.S. state. A 2024 Ipsos poll found that less than 8% of Canadians would even entertain the idea of merging with the United States, and over 80% strongly opposed it. This aligns with decades of consistent polling showing a strong preference for Canadian sovereignty. No major political party in Canada supports annexation, and Canadian media has denounced Trump’s comments as unrealistic and derisive. Therefore, the claim Trump is making about Canadians’ enthusiasm is refuted by data and public discourse.
Claim #3: “Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney rose to power on a tide of anti-Trump sentiment.”
This claim is mostly accurate. Mark Carney, former governor of both the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, launched a campaign with a strong emphasis on countering political extremism and preserving Canadian independence from U.S. influence. While his campaign did not center exclusively on opposition to Trump, Carney did capitalize on anti-Trump sentiment, particularly responses to Trump’s aggressive economic rhetoric and combative foreign policy. His March 2025 electoral victory was widely interpreted as a pushback against Trump-style policies. However, it’s important to note that Carney also ran on broad issues including climate policy, housing, and economic reform.
Claim #4: “The King will ‘reinforce’ that Canada is not for sale.”
This statement is accurate but somewhat symbolic. As Canada’s head of state, King Charles III typically avoids political commentary. However, diplomatic statements released by Canada’s ambassador to the UK, Ralph Goodale, confirm that the King’s visit aims to send a message supporting Canadian sovereignty. During official engagements, especially international ones, monarchs often serve to boost morale and reinforce national values. Buckingham Palace has not publicly stated that the King will make direct references to Trump or the 51st state notion, but indirectly reinforcing Canada’s independence is part of the trip’s optics.
Conclusion
The CNN article accurately reports King Charles III’s politically sensitive visit to Canada while contextualizing U.S.-Canadian tensions. Trump’s comments about Canada becoming a U.S. state are real but exaggerated in public presentation—there is no policy or popular support behind his claims. The article correctly states that Canadians overwhelmingly reject the idea, and prominent leaders like Prime Minister Carney have denounced it formally. While CNN might have amplified the novelty of Trump’s remarks, it does not mislead readers on the facts. The article maintains a balanced tone, with no signs of major factual inaccuracies or editorial bias.
Encourage Readers to Take Action
Want to fact-check news in real time? Download DBUNK’s free app, built to empower users with instant and accurate truth verification. Stay informed—follow us on social media, share your own fact-check requests, and be part of the solution to misinformation.
