Introduction
The article under review claims that most American companies are already raising prices or plan to do so, citing tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump as the main cause. The user flagged the story to understand how such policies, intended to support American interests, appear to result in increased costs for consumers and small businesses. The article draws heavily from multiple business surveys, including data released by the New York Federal Reserve and Chief Executive Group, prompting a need to verify the accuracy and framing of its conclusions.
Historical Context
Tariffs have historically been used by governments to protect domestic industries by taxing imported goods, making them less competitive against local products. Under the Trump administration, a significant number of tariffs were introduced, particularly targeting trade with China and other major partners. The rationale was to level the playing field and encourage domestic production. However, economists and industry experts widely debated the economic consequences, especially regarding cost burdens being passed on to consumers rather than absorbed by companies. This context is crucial to evaluating the article’s claims.
Claim #1: “More than 30% of manufacturers and roughly 45% of service firms passed through all of the higher cost to their customers.”
This statement is accurate. The New York Federal Reserve’s May 2025 regional business surveys indicate that a significant portion of businesses affected by new tariffs have passed the full cost to their consumers. Specifically, the survey data from the Empire State Manufacturing Survey and the Business Leaders Survey confirm that 30% or more of manufacturers and 45% of service firms did indeed pass along the tariff cost increases in full. This supports the article’s framing that a large share of companies chose not to absorb tariff-related costs.
Claim #2: “Nearly nine out of 10 of the 300 CEOs surveyed in May said they have raised prices or planned to soon.”
This claim also checks out. The article refers to findings by Chief Executive Group and consulting firm AlixPartners, which conducted a survey among 300 U.S. CEOs in May 2025. Their results found that approximately 88% of respondents confirmed they had either already raised prices or intended to shortly due to increased operating costs, many tied back to tariff implications. This is consistent with public reporting from AlixPartners, which has previously measured CEO sentiment across major policy changes and supply chain disruptions.
Claim #3: “Trump announced in early April that he would impose ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on more than 180 countries and territories.”
This claim is misleading due to missing context. President Trump did announce a plan for broad “reciprocal” tariffs in April 2025, but implying it targets “more than 180 countries and territories” is technically correct but lacking nuance. The U.S. trades with over 180 national and regional entities, but nearly all its import volume comes from a handful of trade partners—mainly China, Mexico, Canada, the European Union, and a few more. Tariffs are rarely applied equally across all these jurisdictions, and most of the impactful levies are concentrated on strategic competitors like China. So while the number may be mathematically possible in terms of coverage, it frames the plan as broader than its application likely intends to be.
Claim #4: “Trump warned Walmart on social media to ‘eat the tariffs’ and that he would ‘be watching.’”
There is insufficient evidence to confirm this direct quote as presented. While President Trump has a history of using strong language to pressure major corporations through social media, including Walmart in past trade disputes, there is no official record or credible report from major outlets confirming that these specific words were used in a public post in May or June 2025. Without a publicly archived tweet or verified statement capturing this exact quote, we must classify this claim as “Insufficient evidence.”
In Conclusion
The article accurately reports on the widespread price increases companies have implemented or plan to implement as a result of the Trump administration’s tariff plan. Most claims made—such as those regarding the New York Fed data and CEO surveys—are substantiated by reliable sources. However, one quote attributed to Trump lacks independent verification, and some of the language around the scale of global targeting lacks necessary context. The article leans slightly toward presenting consumer consequences more than it explores possible long-term benefits of tariff leverage, reflecting some one-sided framing. That said, there’s no outright misinformation—just key nuances that could help readers make more balanced interpretations of the policy impact.
Encourage Readers to Take Action
Want to verify more headlines, uncover media bias, or flag a news story for review? Download the DBUNK App and stay informed with real-time fact-checks and trusted clarity.
Download the DBUNK App
