Is the Tariff Policy Backfiring on American Consumers? A Critical Look at Pricing Claims
Recent talk of tariff policy under the Trump administration has reignited a national conversation about how these policies actually impact American families and small businesses. The article from CNBC, flagged by a concerned reader, argues that a vast majority of companies are passing these costs on to consumers. But does the data back this up, or is something being left out of the story?
Understanding the Broader Context
The tariff debate in the United States isn’t new. The Trump administration has, since taking office, advocated for what it calls “reciprocal” trade—meaning tariffs placed on countries that already tax U.S. goods. However, many economists warn that tariffs—regardless of who they target—often function as a hidden tax on domestic consumers, as companies paying more for imported goods may increase their prices. Historically, the U.S. saw similar effects during tariff announcements under the previous Trump presidency (2017–2021), notably during trade disputes with China.
Dissecting Key Claims from the Article
Claim #1: “More than 35% of manufacturers and nearly 40% of service firms raised prices within a week of seeing tariff-related cost increases.”
This claim is accurate but narrowly scoped. The New York Federal Reserve did conduct a survey showing this rapid price adjustment shortly after tariff-related costs rose. The New York Fed’s May 2025 Business Leaders Survey indicates that 37% of service-sector firms and 35% of manufacturers raised prices within a week, aligning with the article’s assertion.
However, this doesn’t mean consumers saw immediate across-the-board price jumps. The data reflects businesses likely reacting to pricing pressures but does not suggest every consumer-facing product increased in cost immediately or equally.
Claim #2: “More than 30% of manufacturers and roughly 45% of service firms passed through all of the higher cost to their customers.”
This claim also mirrors the findings from the same New York Fed survey. Specifically, 45% of service providers and 31% of manufacturers reported passing the full extent of tariff-related costs to customers.
While the number is factual, the article skips an important detail: not all businesses were affected equally. Some relied more heavily on foreign imports while others sourced domestically or had long-term supplier contracts insulating them from short-term tariff spikes. As a result, the claim could mislead readers into believing that all sectors face equal pricing pressures.
Claim #3: “Nearly nine out of 10 of the 300 CEOs surveyed in May said they have raised prices or planned to soon.”
This is a true representation of the findings reported by Chief Executive Group and AlixPartners. According to the survey, 88% of CEOs had either raised prices or planned to due to tariffs and other inflationary pressures.
However, what the article leaves out is just as important: not all those price increases are entirely due to tariffs. Many CEOs cited worker shortages, energy costs, and global shipping delays as additional factors. By attributing the price hikes solely to tariffs, the article oversimplifies the cause—and may mislead readers.
Claim #4: “Tariffs alone have created supply chain disruptions rivaling that of Covid-19,” according to a survey respondent.
This quote is directly lifted from the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing survey, and while it is accurately reported, it must be understood for what it is: an anecdotal opinion, not a statistically representative finding. While tariffs undoubtedly disrupt supply chains, especially those dependent on global materials, comparing them to a global pandemic should be treated cautiously. No existing evidence supports the claim that tariff disturbances match the systemic global shutdown of trade during the peak of COVID-19.
Final Verdict: Factually Accurate, but Details are Missing
The CNBC article does a credible job portraying the general consensus among business leaders and economists that tariffs lead to increased costs that, in many cases, are passed along to consumers. The data cited is grounded in reputable surveys and reflects real challenges among American companies.
However, the article does omit relevant context. Notably, it doesn’t explain that not all businesses face equal pressure to raise prices, nor does it clarify that other inflationary drivers—like rising wages, shipping bottlenecks, and energy prices—also play a major role in shaping retail prices. Additionally, the piece leans heavily on emotional and anecdotal quotes without balancing them with counterarguments or neutral expert analysis.
So, for readers asking, “How are these policies helping American consumers or small businesses?”—the uncomfortable truth is that, in the short term, tariffs likely place a greater burden on both. Whether long-term trade leverage or domestic self-sufficiency offsets these disadvantages remains a policy debate with no clear resolution today.
Want to Verify a Claim Yourself?
Curious about another news headline or viral post? You can fact-check it in seconds. Download the DBUNK App and join a growing community that believes truth still matters.
Download the DBUNK App
