Fact-Check: What Caused the Plane Fire at Denver Airport?
Introduction
A recent article published by The New York Times reported that an American Airlines plane caught fire while taxiing at Denver International Airport due to an “engine-related issue.” The article raises concerns about passenger safety and ongoing aviation incidents. However, readers are questioning what exactly caused the engine fire after landing. We conducted a fact-check to verify the claims and assess if any key information was omitted.
Historical Context
Aircraft incidents involving fires, while rare, have occurred throughout aviation history. Modern aircraft engines are built with multiple redundancies to prevent inflight fires, and strict safety protocols exist to handle emergencies. In recent years, aviation safety has come under scrutiny due to several high-profile mechanical failures, including Boeing aircraft malfunctions. Understanding the broader safety trends helps provide context to this latest event.
Fact-Checking Specific Claims
Claim #1: The fire was caused by an “engine-related issue.”
The New York Times article cites American Airlines’ statement that the plane experienced an “engine-related issue” after landing. However, neither the airline nor the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has officially confirmed the cause of the fire. According to FAA records available at the time of writing, a mechanical failure in the plane’s engine or exhaust system is a possible cause, but the investigation remains open. Therefore, while the fire was likely connected to the engine, its precise origin is unconfirmed.
Claim #2: Videos showed flames and smoke from the aircraft.
Eyewitness footage, including a video by Denver resident Mike Insalata, showed black smoke and flames near the right engine. Verified social media videos also depict passengers evacuating via emergency slides. Flight tracking data confirms that the aircraft involved was a Boeing 737-800. This claim is well-supported by multiple independent sources.
Claim #3: The incident is part of a pattern of recent aviation safety issues.
The article references multiple other recent aviation incidents, including aborted landings, ground collisions, and a flipped aircraft. However, it does not clarify whether these incidents share any technical or mechanical similarities with the Denver fire. While aviation safety issues have been increasing in media coverage, experts caution against interpreting unrelated incidents as part of a single trend. The lack of direct correlation between these events makes this comparison somewhat misleading.
Conclusion
The New York Times article accurately reports key details about the fire at Denver International Airport, including footage of flames and passenger evacuations. However, it lacks confirmation on what specifically caused the fire beyond an “engine-related issue.” Additionally, while the article places the event within a broader aviation safety narrative, it does not establish a direct link between different recent incidents. More information is needed from the FAA and American Airlines before making definitive conclusions.
Encourage Readers to Take Action
Want to stay ahead of misinformation? Download the DBUNK app today to fact-check news in real time.
