Fact Check Analysis: REAL ID is now required for air travel in America. Here’s what to expect at airports across the US

Introduction

The CNN article discussing the implementation of the REAL ID Act sparked confusion among travelers across the United States. With the article asserting that enforcement begins immediately and 19% of Americans are not yet compliant, users are concerned about what this means for air travel and when the real, final enforcement date occurs. We investigated these specific concerns and the broader validity of the article’s claims.

Historical Context

The REAL ID Act was passed by Congress in 2005, based on a recommendation made by the 9/11 Commission. It intended to establish minimum security standards for state-issued identification cards to enhance national security. Over the last two decades, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has delayed enforcement multiple times due to technical, administrative, and logistical challenges. Public hesitancy, state-level compliance gaps, and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed significantly to these delays.

Fact-Check of Key Claims

Claim #1: “Starting Wednesday, passengers must use a state-issued ID or license that is REAL ID compliant to travel within the US.”

This statement is misleading. While the article states that enforcement “begins Wednesday,” it omits critical context. The Department of Homeland Security has officially extended the REAL ID enforcement deadline several times, most recently to May 7, 2025. As of the current publication, this date represents the real enforcement deadline. Until that date, travelers can continue to fly using other accepted forms of ID, including regular state-issued licenses (as long as they comply with DHS interim acceptance guidelines), passports, and other federal documents. The article implies a hard start, creating unnecessary urgency for readers who may not yet have REAL ID-compliant credentials.

Source: DHS REAL ID FAQ – https://www.dhs.gov/real-id

Claim #2: “State-issued driver’s licenses and IDs that are not REAL ID compliant are no longer accepted as valid forms of identification at airports.”

This claim lacks nuance and borders on misinformation. While the article cites the TSA as the source, the context reveals that travelers without REAL ID credentials will still be processed at airports. They may undergo extra screening but will not be automatically barred from travel. This is particularly important right now, as TSA agents are being trained to manage a transition phase rather than rigid enforcement. Only after the May 7, 2025 deadline will non-compliant IDs become strictly unacceptable for boarding domestic flights without supplemental documentation.

Source: TSA REAL ID Guidance – https://www.tsa.gov/real-id

Claim #3: “About 19% of people flying nationwide do not have REAL ID yet.”

This claim is accurate according to TSA figures, but the article does not provide appropriate context. While it’s true that only roughly 81% of Americans over the age of 18 currently have either a REAL ID or another compliant identification (like a passport), the article fails to mention that REAL ID compliance is not mandatory if travelers opt to use other ID options. Furthermore, rates of compliance vary significantly by state, with some states like California and New York showing slower adoption due to appointment backlogs and limited DMV staff. The idea that “19% of people can’t fly” is a misreading of the facts. They can—just not necessarily with a standard state ID.

Source: TSA Communications, May 2025 – https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/identification

Conclusion

The CNN article is based on accurate reporting in parts but misleads readers through unclear timelines and overstated enforcement language. It implies immediate and strict restrictions around REAL ID beginning “Wednesday,” when in fact the firm enforcement begins May 7, 2025. While travelers are encouraged to obtain a REAL ID, they are not barred from flying for not having one yet, provided they bring alternative federally recognized identification. Readers deserve a clearer differentiation between an advisory and a mandate. The tone of the article inadvertently causes undue concern, making it appear as though noncompliance will result in denied travel—which is not the case at this time.

Encourage Readers to Take Action

Get clear, verified updates on evolving ID and travel regulations. Download the free DBUNK app to fact-check important news with confidence and follow us on social media to stay informed and empowered. Real facts, in real time—delivered to your fingertips.