Introduction
This article about a runner’s harrowing bear encounter in Myoko, Japan, was flagged for fact-checking due to growing concerns about rising bear attacks and the public’s interest in what actions the Japanese government is taking to control the bear population. Understanding the accuracy of the facts presented—and the broader government response—is crucial for anyone following recent wildlife-related safety issues in Japan.
Historical Context
Japan has a long-standing history with native bear species, notably the Asiatic black bear and brown bear, inhabiting mountainous regions. Traditionally, human-bear conflicts were rare, as bears stayed in forests and rarely approached populated areas. However, in recent years, a combination of habitat changes, decreased nut harvests, and shifting climate patterns has led to increased bear sightings and attacks. With a dwindling population of experienced hunters and ongoing rural depopulation, efforts to manage the bear population have become increasingly urgent, prompting new policy responses from both local and national governments.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: Bear attacks are rising across Japan, with more than 100 people injured this year and at least seven killed, the highest since records began in 2006.
This claim is accurate and well-supported by available data. As of October 2025, Japan recorded seven bear-related fatalities, the largest number since record-keeping began in 2006. There were 108 people injured in 99 separate incidents between April and September 2025, marking a record high for such cases. These statistics are confirmed by reputable sources, including reports from nippon.com.
Claim #2: “In response to this deadly surge, the Japanese government announced on Friday that it will take tougher measures to control the bear population.”
This statement is factual and reflects recent policy changes. In October 2025, the Japanese government announced the relaxation of rules on emergency shootings of bears in populated areas, aiming to empower local authorities and trained hunters to respond quickly to threat incidents. Additionally, the Environment Ministry has increased financial support for local measures such as fencing, training response teams, and considering larger-scale control initiatives. Some regions, like Akita Prefecture, are even seeking military assistance to help cull bears in extreme cases. More details can be found in reports by heidoh.com and Kyodo News.
Claim #3: “Experts say bears are increasingly venturing out of their traditional habitats and into urban areas in search of food because climate change is interfering with their food sources.”
This claim aligns with expert opinions and current research. Changes in climate have disrupted the flowering and fruiting cycles of plants like beech and acorn trees, leading to reduced food availability for bears in the wild. As a result, bears are venturing further into residential and urban areas in search of food. Several sources, including The Japan Times and CBS News, confirm this shift and the role that food scarcity, influenced by climate change, plays in this increased human-bear interaction.
Claim #4: Government and community measures include subsidized hunting, increased funding for local prevention, and conservation efforts.
The Japanese government’s actions are multifaceted. Besides liberalizing emergency shooting regulations, the government provides subsidies to local governments for prevention infrastructure such as fences and early-warning systems. In 2024, the Environment Ministry designated bears as eligible for government-subsidized hunting programs. There is also a movement for enhanced public safety education and collaboration with conservation organizations that focus on sustainable coexistence rather than indiscriminate culling. This broad response is documented in coverage from EFE and The Japan Times.
Conclusion
The news article accurately portrays the current situation regarding increased bear incidents and the Japanese government’s response. The information about the record number of bear attacks, fatalities, and resulting policy adjustments is supported by the latest data and reliable news sources. The article presents a factual account without apparent exaggeration but could provide additional details about the complexity of balancing public safety with wildlife conservation. Overall, its claims hold up to scrutiny, offering readers a clear and nuanced understanding of the issue.
Take Action Now
Concerned about misinformation in your news? Download the DBUNK App to fact-check articles and submit your own requests for free.
Link to Original Article
