Introduction
This article was flagged for fact-checking because it raises concerns about the effectiveness of major tech companies, namely Google, in tackling fake reviews that impact small businesses. The article specifically points out the plight of a Los Angeles small business owner who struggled to get fraudulent reviews removed, despite Google’s supposed advanced detection systems. Readers want to know: If Google can supposedly spot fake reviews so easily, why are small businesses still pleading for help when scams occur?
Historical Context
Online reviews have become a cornerstone of consumer decision-making, especially for small businesses competing in digital marketplaces. Over the last decade, the surge in user-generated reviews has prompted significant investment in fraud detection by tech companies like Google, Yelp, and Amazon. However, fake reviews remain a persistent problem. This issue intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, as more businesses relied on digital visibility and as scammers found new ways to pressure business owners through coordinated review attacks and extortion demands. The tension between the promise of automated fraud controls and the lived experiences of small business owners continues to fuel public frustration.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: “Fraudsters are extorting businesses for hundreds of dollars each by threatening to post fake negative reviews on Google Maps — or posting fake negative reviews and then demanding a payment to remove them.”
This claim is accurate and supported by multiple documented incidents and reputable reports. The Federal Trade Commission, cybersecurity publications, and business advocacy groups have noted an uptick in so-called “review extortion” scams, where fake negative reviews are posted on Google or other platforms, followed by payment demands for their removal. Google’s official statements acknowledge receiving complaints from businesses facing similar extortion threats and report ongoing efforts to combat them. The Wall Street Journal and Reuters have also reported on businesses being targeted with nearly identical tactics. The scenario described, where payment is demanded to suppress phony negative reviews, is well within documented patterns and is not an isolated case. Thus, the article’s description matches the current state of this digital threat.
Claim #2: “They’re also difficult to remove from Google once they’re posted.”
This statement is mostly true and aligns with many business owners’ experiences. While Google publicly claims to use advanced machine learning to detect and swiftly remove fake content, the practical reality is that legitimate businesses frequently wait days or weeks for actions on fraudulent reviews. According to small business forums, tech publications like The Verge, and statements from the National Federation of Independent Business, the appeals process can be slow and often requires repetitive reporting and documentation. The article references Natalia Piper’s experience, noting that “Google eventually removed the reviews after she had reported them,” but only after a prolonged process. These reports confirm that removal is challenging and does not provide immediate relief to affected businesses.
Claim #3: “Google can spot fake reviews so easily.” (Implied claim in the reader question and overall article framing)
This is an implied claim questioned in the reader’s submission and requires careful clarification. Public statements from Google emphasize that they deploy sophisticated algorithms and human moderators to combat review spam. According to Google’s annual “Fake Review Transparency Report,” the company claims to block millions of fraudulent reviews annually. However, both government investigations and independent audits highlight limitations: not all fake reviews are detected preemptively, and the scale of review activity—hundreds of millions annually—means detection systems allow some scams to slip through. A New York Times technology analysis and the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority both found that, while systems are improving, platforms are “far from flawless” and often depend on user reporting to trigger removals. Therefore, while Google can detect many fake reviews, it cannot do so “easily” in every case, especially with rapidly changing scam tactics. The article gives the impression of systematic failure rather than highlighting the volume and challenge inherent to current technology.
Claim #4: “Fake Review Watch data shows that roofing companies, movers and contractors have been targeted across the United States.”
This statement aligns with findings from multiple third-party monitoring groups and industry watchdogs. Industry-specific organizations, such as the Better Business Bureau and consumer protection agencies, have publicly reported that service-based businesses—especially in sectors like moving, roofing, and home repair—tend to be aggressively targeted for fake review attacks. Although “Fake Review Watch” is not a widely recognized household name, the categories listed in the article are consistent with reports from more established consumer groups. The article’s industry focus is sufficiently supported by external evidence and accurately reflects the situation across the United States.
Conclusion
The article accurately portrays the troubling rise of fake review scams that target small businesses. Verified evidence confirms that extortion via negative reviews is both widespread and difficult to resolve promptly, with platforms like Google removing illicit content only after a potentially damaging delay. While Google and other tech companies have made meaningful investments in review fraud detection, limitations remain, especially when handling rapidly evolving scam techniques. The framing of the article may overstate the ease with which Google is expected to resolve such cases, but the fundamental claims made are reliable. Any bias is limited to tone and emphasis rather than factual inaccuracy. Overall, readers can trust that the article describes a real and well-documented problem facing small business owners today.
Take Action Now
Help protect your community from misinformation and stay ahead of digital scams. Download the DBUNK App for free fact-checks and tips. If you see a questionable article, submit your request in the app to help us make the internet safer for everyone.
Link to Original Article
