Introduction
Concerns about the future of Social Security and Medicare continue to grow following CNBC’s June 2025 coverage, which cited updated depletion dates for both programs’ trust funds. Many readers are alarmed — including this user, who asked whether the federal government is letting these programs reach failure just to justify cutting benefits. We investigated the trust fund projections, explored how these funds actually work, and examined the real policy implications behind the numbers.
Historical Context
Social Security was established in 1935 to provide financial support to retired workers, later expanding to include disability and survivor benefits. Medicare followed in 1965 as a public health insurance program primarily for individuals over 65. Both rely on trust funds backed by payroll taxes. Over the decades, demographic shifts — particularly longer life expectancy and the aging baby boomer population — have created increasing pressure on these funds. Trustees release annual reports forecasting their financial health, and policymakers have historically taken steps to address shortfalls, such as the bipartisan Social Security reform of 1983.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: The Social Security retirement trust fund will be depleted by 2033, after which only 77% of benefits will be payable.
This claim is accurate and supported by the official 2025 Social Security Trustees Report. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays retirement and survivor benefits, is projected to be depleted by 2033 if no legislative changes are made. At that point, payroll taxes alone would be sufficient to cover about 77% of scheduled benefits. This estimate matches the 2024 projections, indicating no change from the previous year.
Claim #2: The combined Social Security trust funds (OASI and DI) would be depleted by 2034, a year earlier than previously projected, and only 81% of benefits will be payable.
This is also accurate. The combined funds include the Disability Insurance (DI) component, which has a more favorable balance for now. However, under current law, the funds cannot be legally merged for accounting or payout purposes. Despite this legal separation, the combined depletion date is often cited as a more general benchmark of the program’s financial state. The 2025 Trustees Report confirms this one-year acceleration in projected depletion and the corresponding 81% payable amount.
Claim #3: Medicare’s Hospital Insurance trust fund will be depleted in 2033, at which point only 89% of benefits will be payable.
This claim is true and reflects new information presented in the 2025 Medicare Trustees Report. The Part A Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund, which covers inpatient services, is now expected to be depleted in 2033 — three years earlier than the 2024 projection. This acceleration is due to rising healthcare costs and increasing enrollments, particularly among aging Americans. At the point of depletion, available income will cover approximately 89% of scheduled benefits unless corrective legislation is passed.
Detecting Bias and Missing Context
While the CNBC article largely presents accurate figures, it misses key context that would empower readers to better understand the system. For example, it does not explain that trust fund depletion does not mean the programs stop functioning. Payroll taxes will continue to flow, covering a significant portion of benefits (77% for Social Security and 89% for Medicare). Additionally, there’s no mention of previous successful reforms, like those in the 1980s, which serves to undercut fear-driven narratives.
The user’s concern — whether the government is purposefully delaying reforms to force cuts — is not directly supported by the article or evidence. Multiple administrations, both Republican and Democrat, have called for action. Frank Bisignano’s statement urging Congress to act echoes this. There is no verified indication of an intentional strategy to prompt a crisis as a justification for slashing benefits.
Conclusion
The article’s core claims regarding the dates and projected benefit coverage for the Social Security and Medicare trust funds are factual and align with newly released trustee reports. While the reporting is generally accurate, it lacks critical explanatory context that could prevent public misunderstanding or anxiety — especially around what “depletion” actually means. There’s also no evidence supporting the idea that the government is stalling intentionally in order to gut these programs. Discussions around “reform” are ongoing and vary widely in legislative proposals, but historical precedent demonstrates that bipartisan solutions are possible when political urgency builds.
Take Action Now
Want to stay one step ahead of misinformation and misleading headlines?
Download the DBUNK App for instant access to real-time fact checks that empower you with the truth.
