Fact Check Analysis: South Korean, Vietnamese nationals among ICE’s latest ‘worst of the worst’ roundup in Los Angeles: DHS




News Lead Image

Introduction

This article was flagged after concerns about the fate of immigrants arrested by ICE in Los Angeles during recent federal raids. Specifically, readers are asking whether these individuals, including those convicted of serious crimes, are being released from jail after their ICE arrests.

DBunk Mobile App Awareness Graphic

Historical Context

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has routinely conducted operations to identify, detain, and remove noncitizens with criminal convictions from the United States. In past years, tensions have run high in areas like Los Angeles where “sanctuary” policies at the city or county level sometimes limit local cooperation with ICE. Amid ongoing debates, these high-profile raids, particularly those involving noncitizens with violent criminal histories, attract significant public attention and protest, underscoring a longstanding clash between federal immigration authorities and local advocacy groups.

DBunk: Truth at Your Fingertips

Fact-Check of Specific Claims

Claim #1: “More than 5,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested in the Los Angeles area since June, according to the Department of Homeland Security, including some of the ‘worst of the worst’ violent offenders.”

The article cites statements from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) indicating over 5,000 arrests in Los Angeles since June, including individuals with serious criminal backgrounds. Recent ICE press releases and DHS data confirm that large-scale raids occurred in the Los Angeles area during the referenced period, targeting noncitizens with violent criminal records. While numbers reported by law enforcement are sometimes rounded, multiple government sources—such as official ICE and DHS communications—corroborate figures close to 5,000 arrests in recent summer enforcement pushes in metropolitan centers like Los Angeles.

However, the article refers collectively to “the worst of the worst,” but public arrest records show that while many of those arrested do have criminal histories, not all meet such a designation. Nonetheless, it’s accurate that the highlighted cases involve violent or serious offenses. This claim is therefore substantially accurate.

DBunk: See Every Side of the Story

Claim #2: “Some of the illegal immigrants highlighted by the agency have criminal histories that include violent offenses such as murder, theft and sexual abuse, including against children.”

The article lists specific examples, providing names and alleged convictions for several foreign nationals, such as murder (Justin Chung, South Korea; Juan Carlos Marin-Hipolito, Mexico), rape, and sexual abuse of children (Jaime Sarinana-Rodriguez, Mexico; Joel Benjamin Reyes, El Salvador), among others.
Reviewing available court records and official law enforcement announcements, it is confirmed that multiple individuals named in ICE and DHS reports from the Los Angeles area have been convicted of such offenses. While not all named cases are independently verifiable in public court databases (some may pertain to sealed or non-U.S. convictions), the general characterization of the crimes aligns with what has been officially reported by ICE and covered by various reputable news organizations, including the Associated Press and Reuters. Therefore, this claim is accurate for those highlighted cases, though the article does not clarify their exact immigration or release status.

Claim #3: “Are these illegal immigrants being released from jail in Los Angeles after being arrested by ICE?”

Directly addressing the user’s question: Current federal protocols require that when ICE arrests individuals with prior convictions—especially for violent felonies—they are processed for removal (deportation) proceedings and typically remain in ICE custody if deemed a risk to public safety or flight. California’s sanctuary laws (such as the California Values Act, SB54) limit local law enforcement from honoring ICE detainers for many offenses, but individuals taken directly into ICE custody during raids are usually held in federal detention centers pending immigration hearings, not released locally.

Official ICE guidelines as of 2024 prioritize detention and expedited removal for individuals with violent criminal records. There are rare exceptions if a federal judge grants bond, finds a procedural error, or releases someone under humanitarian parole, but such releases for violent felons are exceedingly uncommon based on available ICE and immigration court data.

In the specific cases cited—such as those already serving long sentences for murder or sexual offenses—the individuals remain in state or federal custody until their sentence ends. Only afterwards could they be transferred to ICE, after which they are generally held for deportation unless a judge orders otherwise. Thus, there is no official evidence that those featured in the article are being released from jail in Los Angeles after ICE arrest. Available DHS and ICE statements indicate these individuals are detained pending immigration proceedings or pending transfer to their home countries.

Conclusion

The article accurately reports that ICE recently arrested thousands of noncitizens in Los Angeles, with a focus on individuals convicted of violent crimes. The specific examples of murderers and sex offenders are consistent with official government sources and court records. However, characterizing all those arrested as the “worst of the worst” overstates the case, as not every one of the thousands arrested fits that description.

In response to the central user question: there is no substantiated evidence that individuals highlighted in the article have been released from jail in Los Angeles following their ICE arrests. Federal protocols and public records indicate they are held pending deportation proceedings or remain incarcerated until their sentences are completed. The article does not misstate the facts about the arrest or detention of these individuals but does frame the operation in a way that strongly emphasizes public safety threats, reflecting a particular narrative. The core facts check out, but not all nuances of the legal process are explained, which could leave some readers with an incomplete understanding.

Take Action Now

Want to see more fact checks and help stop misinformation? Download the DBUNK App to access real-time fact checks or submit your own article requests for free.

Link to Original Article

Read the original article here


Stay Updated with DBUNK Newsletter

Subscribe to our news letter for the latest updates.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy and consent to receive updates.