Fact Check Analysis: Did the United States Threaten Tariffs and Visa Restrictions on Colombia Over Deportation Flights?

Our latest fact check was submitted by one of our dedicated DBUNK subscribers—thank you for your trust in us to clarify the facts! If you have a news article or claim you want reviewed, you’re encouraged to submit your own fact check requests for free using our upcoming DBUNK app. We aim to eliminate confusion and ensure clarity in an era of rampant misinformation.

An Overview of the Issue

The Associated Press article titled “Spat over deportation flights leads U.S. to cancel hundreds of visa appointments in Colombia”, published on January 27, 2025, discusses escalating tensions between the U.S. and Colombia. The article highlights U.S. actions including visa appointment cancellations, proposed tariffs on Colombian exports, and a standoff over the deportation of Colombian nationals.

Our investigation aims to examine whether the article accurately represents the facts, provides the essential context, and avoids any potential misinformation or bias.

Unpacking the Claims

Claim #1: “The U.S. threatened 25% emergency tariffs and other sanctions on Colombia.”

Fact Check: This claim is substantially accurate. According to direct statements from White House sources, U.S. President Donald Trump did propose a 25% emergency tariff on Colombian exports and other measures such as revoking the visas of Colombian government officials and enhancing customs inspections. These measures were framed as retaliatory actions after Colombia temporarily refused to accept deportation flights from the United States.

While the article captures this information, it lacks critical nuance by omitting that discussions between the two nations on deportation protocols had been ongoing for weeks before the public confrontation. This missing context could lead readers to falsely infer that Colombia’s refusal to accept deportation flights came suddenly or zero negotiations had occurred beforehand.

Claim #2: “Colombian President Gustavo Petro shared a video of deportees allegedly arriving in Brazil in shackles.”

Fact Check: This claim is correctly reported, though not independently verified within the article. Publicly available posts on President Petro’s X (formerly Twitter) account corroborate that he did indeed share a video showing deportees allegedly arriving in Brazil shackled. However, the authenticity of the video and its relevance to Colombian deportees specifically were not clarified.

It’s important to note that no official U.S. comment on the video or the treatment of deportees was provided in the article. By failing to address this, the article leaves key questions unanswered, such as whether current U.S. deportation protocols differ between countries or align with international standards for “dignified treatment.”

Claim #3: “Visa cancellations and restrictions may escalate into a larger trade war.”

Fact Check: The article does not definitively state that a trade war is imminent but does suggest the potential for escalation based on escalating threats from both sides. Expert opinions or historical analogies to similar instances of trade or diplomatic conflicts were entirely absent from the piece, leaving readers without critical context regarding the likelihood or precedent of such an outcome. Historically, threats such as these are often leverage in negotiations and rarely result in full-blown trade wars. Moreover, the resolution statement shared Sunday night, as noted in the article, undermines the implication of unavoidable escalation.

Bias and Missing Context in Reporting

Bias: While largely factual, the article’s tone skews slightly toward amplifying drama over diplomacy. The headline emphasizes visa cancellations and trade disputes but fails to reflect the fact that tensions eased significantly after successful negotiations Sunday night.

Missing Context: The lack of comprehensive background details, such as prior negotiations over deportation flights, oversimplifies the issue. Additionally, Colombia’s explanation for its initial refusal to receive the deportees (such as concerns over the treatment of deportees) is limited to one short quote, without elaboration or corroboration from third-party sources.

Conclusion

The Associated Press article provides a generally accurate account of the diplomatic standoff between the U.S. and Colombia but includes missing context about prior negotiations and the broader implications of the deportation dispute. These gaps could lead readers to draw overly dramatic conclusions about the potential for a U.S.-Colombia trade war. It is also evident that more effort could have been taken to verify assertions, such as the legitimacy and origin of the deportees’ video shared by President Petro.

Could this escalation lead to a larger trade war? Historically, similar disputes have resolved before reaching that level, as demonstrated by the quick resolution announced Sunday night. Political rhetoric often amplifies potential consequences for leverage, which appears to be the case here.

To our audience: Always scrutinize the framing of headlines and check whether articles include all relevant context. By downloading our upcoming DBUNK app, you can level up your ability to navigate the information landscape and never fall prey to misinformation.