Introduction
The article was flagged for fact-checking after users questioned whether the ongoing extensions of the TikTok ban under President Trump are rooted in national security concerns or are merely being used as leverage in US-China trade negotiations. Given the high-profile nature of the TikTok discussions and recurring deadline extensions, it’s crucial to assess the accuracy of reported facts and underlying motives.
Historical Context
The debate over TikTok’s presence in the United States began in 2020 amid concerns that user data might be accessed by the Chinese government through TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance. Previous US administrations, citing national security, have pushed ByteDance to divest TikTok’s US operations to an American entity. The discussion has also overlapped wider US-China economic tensions, with tariffs, technology access, and trade restrictions shaping negotiations beyond TikTok itself.
Fact-Check: Specific Claims
Claim #1: President Trump has extended the TikTok ban three times, with the initial ban set before he took office on January 19.
The article states, “Trump has now extended the TikTok ban three times after it initially went into effect on January 19, a day before Trump took office.” This timeline is inaccurate. Donald Trump’s current term referenced in the article began in January 2025, but the original push to ban TikTok occurred during his previous presidency in 2020. There is no public record that the ban was initiated on January 19, 2025, before his current term, nor any evidence that exactly three extensions have occurred in 2025. Executive actions seeking to restrict TikTok did resume under Trump, but the ban timeline as presented is misleading and omits the complex history from prior years. The claim lacks precise context and accurate dates, oversimplifying the ongoing legal and diplomatic back-and-forth.
Claim #2: The Trump administration has reached a deal with China to keep TikTok operational in the US, subject to a final call with President Xi Jinping.
The article asserts, “The Trump administration on Monday announced a deal has finally been reached between the United States and China to keep TikTok operational… a US-backed buyer is expected to take control… after Trump and China’s leader Xi Jinping hold a phone call Friday to finalize the sale agreement.” There have been multiple instances in past negotiations where tentative deals were announced but later fell through due to regulatory or political hurdles on both sides. Previous attempts to transfer control to American investors have not reached final closure, and as of this report, there is no independently confirmed evidence from government filings or statements verifying that a complete deal has been officially accepted by both US and Chinese authorities. Until an official announcement and regulatory approval are made public, this claim remains unsubstantiated and is presented as more definitive than current facts allow.
Claim #3: National security was prioritized over trade deal incentives, and the TikTok sale did not compromise US national security interests.
The Treasury Secretary is quoted as saying, “We were not willing to give up national security in favor of the deal … agreements mostly for things we will not be doing in the future that will have no impact on national security.” While national security concerns have been repeatedly cited in official statements about TikTok’s US operations, internal government reviews and reporting by reputable outlets such as Reuters and The Wall Street Journal consistently show that negotiations between the US and China over TikTok have included trade and diplomatic leverage as key motivators. Both parties have used TikTok’s regulatory status as a bargaining chip in wider trade and diplomatic talks, and compromises have sometimes included regulatory loopholes or delays rather than direct actions to resolve security fears. Therefore, while the deal may include provisions for data security, the statement minimizes the role that trade and diplomatic incentives have played, offering a partial truth that omits the broader context.
Conclusion
This article delivers a narrative that US leadership is both defending national security and making progress on a TikTok deal with China. However, certain claims are presented with insufficient context or contain inaccuracies—most notably, errors in the timeline of TikTok ban extensions and the implication that a comprehensive, finalized deal has been reached. The focus on national security as the sole driver of the negotiations does not fully reflect the role of trade leverage and diplomatic bargaining, as seen in ongoing US-China technology disputes. Readers should recognize that the situation is fluid and partially driven by American and Chinese interests extending beyond straightforward security issues, with political posturing and broader diplomatic negotiations deeply entwined.
Take Action Now
Want to get the facts fast and stay ahead of misinformation? Download the DBUNK App and join a growing community that values truth in news.
