Fact Check: Trump’s Alleged Proposal for the U.S. to Take Over Gaza

Published: February 5, 2025

Did Trump Really Call for a U.S. Takeover of Gaza?

A recent article by The New York Times claims that former President Donald Trump proposed that the United States should take control of Gaza and relocate its Palestinian population. This bold assertion has sparked intense debate. But is it entirely accurate?

What We Found

After reviewing available transcripts and statements from the press event, we found that the article includes significant extrapolation of Trump’s remarks, leading to potential misrepresentation of his actual statements.

Misleading Interpretation of Trump’s Words

The article states: “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it too,” Mr. Trump said at a news conference Tuesday evening. However, in full context, Trump’s comments appeared vague and speculative rather than an official policy proposal.

Trump did suggest that countries in the region, including the U.S., could play a role in rebuilding Gaza, but he did not outline a formal military or governmental takeover. The framing of his statement as a definitive plan significantly overstates his remarks.

Lack of Clarification on Legal Authority Issues

The article correctly points out that no legal basis was mentioned for any such U.S. action. However, it presents the claim as if Trump was actively pushing for an imminent occupation, which lacks supporting evidence.

The Forced Relocation Claim

The article implies that Trump advocated for the complete displacement of all Palestinians in Gaza. While he did mention regional resettlements as an option, there is no indication he called for “forcible removal” as stated in the article.

So, What’s the Verdict?

While Trump made controversial and broad statements about the future of Gaza, the claim that he proposed a U.S. takeover as an actionable policy is an exaggeration. The article selectively presents his remarks in a way that amplifies their impact without confirming whether this was a serious or formal initiative.

It’s critical to distinguish between speculation and official proposals. Trump often speaks in broad, unscripted terms, and while his remarks raise legitimate concerns, portraying them as a concrete geopolitical strategy is misleading.

What This Means for Readers

In a media environment where political statements are quickly turned into viral headlines, it is crucial to critically evaluate whether reports present a nuanced view or selectively frame statements for impact.

One of our subscribers submitted this fact check request to ensure that misinformation isn’t left unchecked. You too can submit claims for us to investigate. Together, we can continue challenging misleading news and ensuring the public stays informed.

Final Rating: Misleading

While Trump did mention rebuilding Gaza, the claim that he called for a U.S. takeover is an overstatement. His words were speculative rather than an actionable policy or directive.

Join the Fight Against Misinformation

Want to avoid falling for sensational headlines? Download the DBUNK app and stay one step ahead of misinformation.