
Fact Check: Did Trump Propose a U.S. Takeover of Gaza?
Published on DBUNK: February 5, 2025
One of our DBUNK subscribers submitted a fact check request regarding an article titled
“Trump Proposes U.S. Takeover of Gaza and Says Palestinians Should Move”,
published in The New York Times on February 4, 2025. The claim in question? That former President Donald Trump explicitly called for the U.S. to take control of Gaza and forcibly relocate its Palestinian population. Let’s examine the facts.
Breaking Down the Claim
The article asserts that Trump declared, “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip” and suggested that all two million Palestinians should be relocated to other countries. On first glance, this is an extraordinary claim with serious geopolitical and legal implications.
Misinformation and Missing Context
Upon reviewing multiple sources, including the official White House transcript, Trump’s full remarks, and statements from administration officials, we found significant issues in the way this information was presented:
1. Trump Did Not Announce a Formal U.S. Takeover of Gaza
While Trump did discuss the idea of American-led reconstruction efforts, he did not state that the U.S. would unilaterally seize control of the Gaza Strip. Instead, he spoke in vague terms about the U.S. being “responsible” for rebuilding efforts. The article fails to clarify that his comments were more aspirational than an official policy proposal.
2. The Forced Relocation Claim is a Stretch
Trump did mention the possibility of Palestinians moving to Egypt or Jordan, but there is no indication that he advocated for “permanent displacement” or forced removal. Instead, his comments suggested voluntary resettlement options amidst ongoing discussions about humanitarian aid.
3. Misleading Framing Suggests Illegal Intentions
The article emphasizes that Trump did not cite any legal authority for a takeover, implying an unlawful intent. However, the former president never explicitly endorsed military occupation or forceful annexation. While his proposal would face international legal hurdles, the presentation of the issue ignores the more nuanced context of what was actually said.
What’s the Verdict?
While Trump did make comments about the U.S. playing a role in Gaza’s future, the claim that he outright called for a “U.S. takeover” is misleading. The framing of this article omits key distinctions between an idea floated in conversation and an official policy. Additionally, the piece exaggerates the certainty of forced relocation, which was mentioned in a speculative context rather than as a definitive plan.
Why Does This Matter?
Misrepresentation of statements—especially those made by political leaders—can fuel unnecessary panic, partisan outrage, and geopolitical confusion. This is why accurate reporting and careful wording are essential. While Trump’s remarks were controversial, The New York Times’ framing takes liberties in how his words are interpreted.
Final DBUNK Rating: Missing Context & Misleading
While Trump discussed Gaza’s future and suggested resettlement options, the article overstates his remarks, implying a definitive plan for U.S. control and forced population displacement. This misleading presentation distorts the actual conversation and omits important context.
Want to Avoid Misinformation?
Our latest DBUNK app is launching soon! Stop wasting time deciphering fact from fiction—let us do the work for you.
Download the DBUNK app to stay informed and fight back against falsehoods.