Introduction
This article was flagged for fact-checking after readers questioned whether Fox News amplified President Trump’s sarcastic response to the “No Kings” protests or if the president’s remarks indicated a disregard for democratic accountability. The nationwide demonstrations drew intense public attention, making accuracy and context critical for understanding this high-profile political exchange.
Historical Context
The “No Kings” protests arose from concerns over President Trump’s leadership style and increasing worries about perceived authoritarian tendencies and the concentration of executive power. These demonstrations on October 18, 2025, followed similar waves of public dissent in recent U.S. history and channeled frustration about constitutional norms, government accountability, and democratic values. Organizers framed the protests as a peaceful show of resistance, drawing millions into the streets across numerous cities, echoing nationwide debates over the proper role of American leadership and the presidency.
Fact-Check of Specific Claims
Claim #1: Trump’s “I’m not a king” remark proves he sees himself as an unaccountable monarch
President Trump explicitly denied being a king by stating, “I’m not a king, I work my ass off to make our country great.” His verbal dismissal occurred in reply to protest themes likening his leadership to monarchy. The context shows his comments were a direct, if sarcastic, retort rather than an admission or embrace of authoritarian identity. Independent coverage reflects this was a typical rhetorical deflection rather than concrete evidence of self-perceived unaccountability. Source: Washington Post. However, some ambiguity is introduced by a Trump campaign video depicting him as a monarch, which critics saw as mocking protest concerns. Source: NDTV. On balance, Trump’s spoken response does not itself prove he sees himself as above the Constitution; it was intended as a sarcastic dismissal.
Claim #2: The article downplays the scale and peacefulness of the protests
The article echoes Trump’s assessment that the demonstrations were “very small, very ineffective,” implying they were not representative of the broader public. Research shows this claim is incorrect. Contemporary reports confirm that participation was historic — with nearly 7 million attendees nationwide and over 100,000 in New York City alone. The “No Kings” actions were among the largest peaceful protests in U.S. history, with no protest-related arrests in major cities including New York, Washington, D.C., and others. Source: ABC News, The Week. The article’s minimizing language omits crucial context about the breadth and overwhelmingly peaceful nature of the movement.
Claim #3: The protests were funded by George Soros and “radical left lunatics”
The article quotes President Trump suggesting that billionaire George Soros and “other radical left lunatics” financed the protesters, a frequent refrain in U.S. politics. There is no confirmed evidence to support this allegation for the “No Kings” protests. Documentation shows the demonstrations were chiefly organized by the ACLU, Indivisible, unions, and allied pro-democracy groups. The Soros claim perpetuates an unproven conspiracy theory and provides insufficient evidence for any direct large-scale funding by Soros for these events. Source: ABC News.
Claim #4: Despite concerns, the demonstrations were peaceful with no arrests
The article accurately states that, despite initial worries about unrest, the events remained largely peaceful, with no protest-related arrests reported in major cities. This is fully confirmed by police reports and on-the-ground reporting from New York, Washington, D.C., and other U.S. cities on October 18. Source: CBS News. This point was significant in reinforcing the message of democratic dissent through nonviolent demonstration.
Conclusion
This article provides an accurate account of President Trump’s deflection of the “No Kings” protests but underplays the true scale and peaceful nature of the demonstrations. Claims about the protests being small, unrepresentative, or Soros-funded are not supported by available evidence. However, the article does accurately represent Trump’s stated denial of seeing himself as a king and correctly notes the overall peacefulness of the rallies. Readers should be attentive to selective framing and the omission of critical information that shapes public perception of major political events.
Take Action Now
Want to quickly verify news, flag misinformation, or see every side of the story? Download the DBUNK App and join a community committed to news transparency and truth.
Link to Original Article
