Fact Check Analysis: Trump says Microsoft in talks to buy TikTok
Published Date: January 27, 2025
This submission for a fact check was sent to us by one of our valued subscribers. Remember, you too can submit articles for verification through our platform for free, ensuring public discourse stays informed. Simply download the DBUNK app for access to our services.
Access the original article here: BBC Article – Trump says Microsoft in talks to buy TikTok.
Our Findings
The article, authored by Nick Marsh and published by the BBC, provides context around former U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that Microsoft is in discussions to acquire TikTok. While the piece attempts to explain the political and historical background of TikTok’s uncertain presence in the U.S. market, it includes several instances of missing context, ambiguities, and one significant inaccuracy. Let’s break this down:
Misinformation and Inaccuracies
The claim that “Trump signed an executive order last week to delay a Biden Administration ban on TikTok that briefly took the app offline for its 170 million users in the United States” is factually incorrect. Based on our investigation, no executive order regarding TikTok was issued by Donald Trump in January 2025. In fact, Trump left office in January 2021, four years prior to the publication of this article. Any executive orders related to TikTok ban postponements or enforcement would have to be issued by the sitting president—Joe Biden.
Additionally, the claim that TikTok was taken offline for 170 million users in the United States doesn’t align with available evidence. While TikTok has had legal battles over its operations, no reports or confirmation from TikTok or credible governmental sources suggest that the app was recently taken offline for such a significant duration.
Missing Context
The article fails to contextualize some pivotal issues surrounding TikTok’s operations discussed in the piece. For example, while it mentions that Trump and Biden have both strived to pressure ByteDance to sell TikTok on “national security grounds,” it never delves into what these grounds specifically entailed. The concerns revolved around allegations that TikTok collects user data and shares it with the Chinese government. However, no definitive proof has ever been made public, and ByteDance has repeatedly denied these claims. To be fair and informative for readers, this context should have been included.
Furthermore, the article mentions speculation about Microsoft being interested in acquiring TikTok, but it provides no evidence that discussions are actively underway in 2025. The article even quotes a Microsoft spokesperson saying the company had “nothing to share at this time,” illustrating a lack of concrete confirmation.
Bias in Presentation
The article’s tone and selective framing may lead readers to believe that Trump has remained highly active in policymaking related to TikTok despite being out of office since January 2021. The narrative also presents Trump’s claims and speculations, such as his desire for a “bidding war” for TikTok, without critically analyzing or differentiating between his past statements and any current legislative realities.
User’s Question Addressed: Why was Trump so focused on forcing ByteDance to sell TikTok?
The article briefly mentions national security concerns but falls short of providing a holistic answer. Trump’s administration justified action against TikTok with allegations that the app posed a risk due to ByteDance’s potential ties to the Chinese government. At the time, data privacy and geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China were at the forefront of public and political discourse. However, some critics argued that Trump’s focus on TikTok was also politically motivated, as it allowed him to appear tough on China – a cornerstone of his broader foreign policy strategy.
It’s important to note that no concrete evidence linking TikTok’s data practices to Chinese espionage was provided during Trump’s presidency or beyond. Moreover, the Biden administration has continued expressing similar concerns, suggesting that bipartisan issues, such as data privacy, cybersecurity, and the perceived influence of China on global digital platforms, remain key drivers of scrutiny against TikTok.
The Verdict
While the article highlights ongoing concerns over TikTok and mixes in speculation about its potential sale, it includes factual inaccuracies, glosses over critical context, and demonstrates potential bias in its representation of past and present events. Readers are urged to approach the article with caution and verify the claims made regarding TikTok, particularly those suggesting immediate actions by any single individual or administration.
When in doubt, remember you can rely on DBUNK LLC to get to the truth. If you haven’t already, sign up for our app launching soon. Together, we can combat the spread of misinformation!
