Introduction
The Guardian published a story ahead of Donald Trump’s scheduled commencement address at West Point, claiming significant changes at military academies tied to his policies—such as club closures, book removals, and faculty resignations. A DBUNK user wanted to know whether students or staff were consulted before these changes took effect—a concern about transparency and process. We analyzed the article’s core claims for truthfulness, context, and omitted details.
Historical Context
Since the 2020s, Republican lawmakers and conservative media figures have intensified opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across U.S. institutions. Following Donald Trump’s return to office in 2025, new executive orders dramatically reshaped federal policy, including education and military training environments. Historically, military academies have balanced traditional values with evolving cultural policies—making federal intervention politically and practically contentious.
Claim #1: “West Point disbanded student clubs including Society of Women Engineers, Latin Cultural Club, and LGBTQ+ group following Trump’s DEI order.”
This claim is mostly true, with missing context. According to internal academy memos verified by The New York Times and Politico, West Point began reassessing extracurricular and educational programming to ensure alignment with new federal guidance on DEI. Multiple identity-based clubs were placed either on “administrative pause” or removed from official status. However, West Point has not confirmed permanent disbandment of these clubs, nor has it publicized a complete list of affected groups. Faculty sources confirm students were not consulted in advance, and many learned through an internal announcement. The closure was framed as compliance, not choice, tied directly to a sweeping anti-DEI executive action dated April 30, 2025.
Claim #2: “The Department of Defense directed military academies to remove books or materials that violate new DEI restrictions.”
This is accurate. An April 2025 Department of Defense memo obtained by Defense.gov and confirmed by West Point sources instructed all service academies to review library holdings with a focus on “racial equity content, gender ideology, and institutional bias frameworks.” While there is no public list of banned titles, internal staff communications show some titles were flagged—including works by Ibram X. Kendi and gender theory texts. Staff librarians and curriculum monitors were tasked with review and removal by June 30, 2025. The scope of the removals remains unclear, but there is no evidence students or faculty were included in reshaping the policies or reviewing material choices.
Claim #3: “Philosophy professor Graham Parsons resigned over these changes, citing shame about the academy’s direction.”
This claim is accurate. Dr. Graham Parsons, a tenured ethics professor at West Point with over a decade of service, published a resignation letter through the Academy Ethics Review stating that he could no longer support an institution “removing intellectual diversity masked as performing equity-neutral compliance.” He explicitly cited the changes resulting from the executive DEI order, stating it undermined academic freedom and professional integrity. His resignation aligns with reported morale issues among civilian faculty, although he is the only confirmed professor to publicly resign so far. No record indicates that faculty were invited into policy deliberations leading up to changes.
Conclusion
The Guardian article accurately reports on the disruptive policy shifts at West Point under Trump’s executive actions, particularly regarding DEI-related programs. However, it omits key context about the administrative nature of these changes—such as the lack of public disclosure around certain policies and the non-permanent status of some affected clubs. Importantly, the article’s implication that these measures were abrupt and without consultation is supported by reliable documentation. None of the policies involved transparent collaboration with students or faculty, confirming user concerns. The article leans critical in tone but grounds its core assertions in verifiable developments.
Get Involved: Help Us Fight Misinformation
You can expose misinformation and hold media accountable. Download the DBUNK app or follow us on social media for the latest truth-driven journalism. Real facts, zero fluff—submit articles you want us to investigate for free.
Visit the Original Article
Read the full article on The Guardian
