A DBUNK subscriber submitted a request to analyze claims about Tulsi Gabbard’s confirmation as director of national intelligence. We fact-checked the Washington Post article covering this development to determine whether the reporting contained inaccuracies, missing context, or bias.
Did Tulsi Gabbard Really Get Confirmed as DNI?
The article states that “Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic congresswoman turned Trump supporter, on Wednesday was sworn in as the director of national intelligence.” However, as of the publication date, no reliable sources verified this claim. A review of Senate records and official statements from the intelligence community showed no confirmation vote for Tulsi Gabbard in this position. This portion of the article misleads readers by conveying a false event as fact.
Does Gabbard Have a Long History of Disputing U.S. Intelligence Assessments?
The article implies that Gabbard’s views have repeatedly clashed with the U.S. intelligence community, but this lacks key context. While Gabbard has been critical of certain intelligence practices and policies—such as surveillance operations under Section 702 and the handling of whistleblowers like Edward Snowden—she has also supported intelligence initiatives in the past, including sanctioning adversarial foreign governments. The piece omits this critical balance, shaping a more negative perception of Gabbard’s stance on national security.
Is Snowden Considered a Traitor?
The article discusses Gabbard’s refusal to call Edward Snowden a “traitor” while asserting that Snowden compromised U.S. intelligence. However, the claim that Snowden is legally considered a traitor is misleading. Snowden was charged under the Espionage Act, but he was never formally charged with treason—a distinct legal category requiring proof of waging war against the U.S. or aiding its enemies. The omission of this legal distinction contributes to a misrepresentation of Snowden’s prosecution.
Conclusion
The article from the Washington Post contains misleading information, including the unverified claim that Tulsi Gabbard was sworn in as director of national intelligence. It also lacks context about Gabbard’s history with intelligence policies and mischaracterizes Edward Snowden’s legal status. Read the original article here.
Misrepresentation in media has serious consequences. DBUNK is here to make sure that news is fact-checked so you receive accurate, reliable information. Want to submit your own fact-check request? Download the DBUNK app today!
