Fact Check Analysis: Ukraine sees first major anti-government protests since start of war, as Zelensky moves to weaken anti-corruption agencies

Introduction

A recent article published by CNN on July 23, 2025, sparked widespread attention by reporting on Ukraine’s internal anti-corruption crackdowns, rising public protests, and suggestions that President Volodymyr Zelensky could be weakening oversight agencies. The user has specifically asked whether Zelensky has ever been charged with corruption, a question that stems from the article’s broader framing of government integrity amid political turbulence. In this fact-check, we examine the key claims presented and clarify the current status of investigations while evaluating for bias or missing context.

Historical Context

Since gaining independence in 1991, Ukraine has boasted a complex political landscape frequently rocked by corruption scandals. Following the 2014 Euromaidan protests, anti-corruption reforms gained momentum under pressure from Western allies. President Zelensky, elected in 2019 on an anti-corruption platform, vowed to overhaul the country’s corrupt institutions. His leadership has been tested, especially during the ongoing war with Russia, where public trust and institutional integrity face increased scrutiny from both domestic and international watchdogs.

Fact-Check Specific Claims

Claim #1: President Volodymyr Zelensky has been charged with corruption

There is no evidence that President Zelensky has ever been formally charged with corruption. As of the time of publication, neither Ukrainian nor international legal authorities—including the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO), or any international tribunal—have filed charges against him. While Zelensky’s administration has at times been criticized for insufficient progress on reforms or for dismissing anti-corruption officials, this does not equate to formal criminal charges.
Verified sources such as the European Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law Report and Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index support that Ukraine is making anti-corruption efforts, and Zelensky has not been individually implicated in wrongdoing.

Claim #2: The Ukrainian government is actively weakening anti-corruption agencies

This claim contains important nuance. The CNN article implies that recent government actions may be undermining Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies. However, a fuller picture reveals both internal investigations and structural changes are underway, often with external oversight.
For example, in early 2025, Ukraine’s parliament debated amendments to the NABU mandate and dismissed some officials amid allegations of inefficiency and politicization. Critics, including some civil society groups, view such moves as attempts to exert executive control. However, these actions also reflect broader efforts to streamline or depoliticize agencies under the scrutiny of Ukraine’s Western allies.
The European Union’s follow-up statements in June 2025 noted concerns but also acknowledged that Ukraine “maintains alignment on anti-corruption commitments.” Thus, while public sentiment may perceive obstruction, the evidence does not conclusively support that the Zelensky administration is systematically weakening anti-corruption bodies.

Claim #3: Protests are widespread and reflect large-scale dissatisfaction

While protests have occurred, the article omits significant context about their scale and cause. CNN notes “protests after a series of high-profile arrests,” suggesting a wave of national opposition. In reality, local media reports and international analyses indicate that the demonstrations were localized and involved a few thousand protesters, mainly concentrated in Kyiv.
The protests arose in response to the arrest of some prominent figures within the anti-corruption community and differences over judicial appointments. Importantly, there are also counter-demonstrations supporting the government’s anti-corruption efforts, which the article briefly mentions but does not explore in depth. The framing, while not outright false, lacks balance and may overstate national unrest.

Claim #4: The fight against corruption is being undermined amid Ukraine’s EU integration process

This suggestion appears throughout the article but lacks clarity. Specifically, the statement that “the situation has drawn international attention” might imply jeopardy to Ukraine’s status with the European Union. While EU officials have expressed concern about the transparency of reforms, Ukraine’s pre-accession evaluation remains on track.
On July 10, 2025, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen confirmed that Ukraine’s alignment with EU governance standards is “advancing, though not without challenges.” The assumption that anti-corruption efforts are regressing across the board is misleading; Ukraine continues to score modest improvements on governance and transparency indices, albeit slowly.

Conclusion

The CNN article is generally accurate in reporting recent events, including heightened tensions around Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies and subsequent public response. However, it lacks critical context in several key areas and frames some developments in a way that may lead readers to overestimate the severity of domestic backlash or institutional collapse. Importantly, President Zelensky has not been charged with corruption, despite ongoing scrutiny of his administration. Readers should remain cautious when interpreting complex political environments and consider a range of perspectives for clarity.

Take Action Now

Want to get the truth faster? Download the DBUNK App and join thousands who stay sharp against misinformation.
Download the DBUNK App