Introduction
A recent CNN article reported on Ukrainian drone attacks against Moscow ahead of Russia’s Victory Day parade, drawing attention for its depiction of escalating conflict and global implications. The user’s main query focused on a practical and revealing question: who manufactures the drones that Ukraine is deploying in these high-profile cross-border strikes? We investigate the claims surrounding drone production, recent combat developments, and how this story aligns with established facts — identifying where context is missing and details may be oversimplified.
Historical Context
Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022, both sides have increasingly relied on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, for surveillance, airstrikes, and sabotage behind enemy lines. Ukraine, lacking Russia’s immense military hardware, has turned to drones as a cost-effective and increasingly lethal option. Victory Day, celebrated annually on May 9 in Russia, marks the Soviet triumph over Nazi Germany and is deeply symbolic; drone attacks near this day signify a shift in informational and tactical warfare amid public ceremonies and international attention.
Claim #1: Ukraine launched 105 drones across Russia, including 19 targeting Moscow
This claim aligns with statements made by Russia’s Ministry of Defense and echoed by Moscow’s mayor, Sergey Sobyanin. While independently verifying specific numbers is difficult due to wartime propaganda on both sides, the frequency and scale of drone attacks have been confirmed by multiple independent sources. Reports from the Institute for the Study of War and other defense analysts confirm a surge in drone strikes inside Russian territory, including attacks on Moscow’s outskirts. Official Ukrainian statements tend to withhold exact operational figures, but they have acknowledged intensifying aerial and seaborne drone efforts.
Verdict: Accurate based on available reporting and corroborating sources.
Claim #2: Ukraine manufactured the drones used in the Moscow attacks
The article states that Ukrainian drones attacked Moscow but does not clarify who produced them. Ukraine employs a wide array of drone types, including Western-made UAVs like the Bayraktar TB2 (Turkish) and U.S.-supplied surveillance drones; however, the tactical drones frequently used in cross-border attacks are more often domestically designed and built. Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation has actively supported domestic tech startups, leading to the development of drones such as the UJ-22, R18, and homebuilt FPV drones.
Moreover, in March 2024, Ukrainian officials confirmed advancements in their domestic drone fleet, including a long-range Kamikaze drone reported to have a range of over 1,000 kilometers. Wired and Financial Times reported in 2024 that Ukraine had ramped up domestic drone production specifically for penetrating Russian airspace.
Verdict: Most drones used in attacks on Moscow are domestically produced by Ukraine, with some components potentially sourced internationally.
Claim #3: Debris from intercepted Ukrainian drones caused disruptions at multiple Moscow airports
According to both Russian aviation regulators and Moscow authorities, several major airports — including Sheremetyevo, Domodedovo, Vnukovo, and Zhukovsky — temporarily suspended operations due to drone activity. Flight radar data from the night in question confirms delays and rerouting were consistent with extreme airspace restrictions.
Flightradar24, a leading source on such data, shows irregularities in flight paths and hover patterns during nighttime hours mentioned, in line with official reports. Debris landing on highways, while not causing casualties, was reported by multiple Russian and international news agencies.
Verdict: Confirmed and consistent with independent flight tracking data and incident reports.
Claim #4: Ukraine retains presence in Russia’s Kursk region
The article mentions a CNN interview with a Ukrainian official stating that their forces maintain positions in Russia’s Kursk region. This contradicts earlier Russian claims that the incursion had been “completely repelled.” Ukraine has previously conducted limited cross-frontier raids, often using special operations forces or allied partisan groups. However, verifying ongoing military presence in enemy territory is highly challenging without direct evidence.
Open-source intelligence (OSINT) accounts, including GeoConfirmed, have reported unusual activity near the border but not permanently held positions. The language of “presence” could imply anything from sabotage teams to temporary reconnaissance missions.
Verdict: Insufficient evidence to fully confirm the extent or duration of Ukraine’s presence in Kursk, though limited incursions have occurred.
Conclusion
CNN’s report is largely accurate in relaying events such as the timing and scope of the drone attacks on Moscow, disruptions to airports, and the geopolitical spectacle unfolding around Victory Day. However, the article fails to clarify the origin and manufacturers of the drones — a key element in understanding how Ukraine is sustaining these operations. Most evidence strongly points toward Ukraine’s growing capacity to produce drones domestically, aided by international technology but significantly homegrown in design and assembly.
Additionally, while the article provides detailed commentary on the broader geopolitical climate, it avoids deeper examination of inconsistencies — particularly around disputed control over regions like Kursk. Overall, the article leans on reliable factual elements, though it would benefit from more transparency and technical analysis regarding Ukraine’s drone capabilities.
Want to Verify a Story?
Have questions about what you’re seeing in the news? Download the DBUNK app for free to send us the articles you’d like fact-checked. Stay informed, stay empowered, and stand against misinformation.
