Introduction
This article was flagged for fact-checking after readers expressed confusion around the recent legal proceedings against New York Attorney General Letitia James, including whether she has ever faced criminal charges. With high public interest and evolving legal developments, clarity and accuracy on these claims are essential for maintaining trust in reporting and preventing the spread of misinformation.
Historical Context
Letitia James has served as New York’s Attorney General since 2019 and is widely recognized for high-profile investigations, including those involving former President Donald Trump and major corporations. The Justice Department’s recent cases against James and former FBI Director James Comey were initiated during a tense national debate over the impartiality of legal actions involving political figures. These events have drawn intense media attention, contributing to widespread speculation, scrutiny, and some confusion about the facts.
Fact-Check: Key Claims
Claim #1: Letitia James was accused of professional misconduct regarding her Virginia mortgage by a watchdog group.
The article states that the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA), a conservative-leaning watchdog group, filed a bar complaint alleging that Letitia James engaged in “illegal and dishonest conduct” connected to a mortgage on a Norfolk, Virginia property. According to the official complaint housed on media.aflegal.org, this claim is accurate: the group filed a formal complaint with the Attorney Grievance Committee. However, a bar complaint is not a criminal charge—it’s an ethics inquiry for licensed attorneys.
The article presents CASA’s accusations but does not clarify that the mere filing of a complaint does not establish guilt or misconduct. No professional discipline has yet been imposed on James as a result of CASA’s complaint.
Claim #2: Letitia James was indicted on criminal charges in 2025, and the federal judge dismissed those charges.
The article accurately reports that Letitia James was indicted in October 2025 on charges of bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution. The indictment alleged she claimed a Virginia property was her principal residence to obtain a mortgage while serving as New York Attorney General. As confirmed by CBS News and AP News, James pleaded not guilty and denied any intentional wrongdoing.
On November 24, 2025, a federal judge, Cameron McGowan Currie, dismissed the indictment based on the finding that the acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan was improperly appointed and not legally authorized to pursue the indictment. This detail is consistent with coverage from CBS News and The Week.
Claim #3: The dismissal of charges does not prevent future prosecution, and the Justice Department plans to appeal.
The article correctly notes that the charges against Letitia James were dismissed “without prejudice,” which allows for the possibility of refiling if authorities choose to do so. According to both AP News and Reuters, the Justice Department has publicly stated its intent to appeal the judge’s decision. However, an appeal or future charges do not equate to a conviction or confirmation of wrongdoing; these steps are part of the standard legal process.
The article clearly outlines the procedural status, yet it could do more to ensure readers understand that dismissal “without prejudice” is a legal matter relating to proper prosecution, not a declaration of innocence or guilt.
Claim #4: Has Letitia James ever been charged with a crime?
In response to the user’s main question, yes: Letitia James was indicted in October 2025 on one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution, as corroborated by CBS News and AP News. However, the charges were dismissed on November 24, 2025, after the court found the prosecutor was not lawfully appointed, voiding the indictment. At this time, James is not facing any active criminal charges, though the Department of Justice has indicated it could appeal or refile the indictment.
Conclusion
The article’s discussion of the bar complaint, indictment, and subsequent dismissal of charges against Letitia James is accurate and generally supported by the most recent reputable sources. However, the article could better clarify the difference between allegations, ethics complaints, and criminal charges—especially for readers less familiar with legal terminology. There is some missing context regarding the significance and implications of a bar complaint versus formal criminal prosecution. No active criminal charges remain against Letitia James at present, but her legal situation remains under review as the Justice Department considers an appeal. The article does not misstate the facts but could have gone further in preventing misinterpretation or confusion, especially about the current legal status of the Attorney General.
Take Action Now
Want clarity and facts you can trust? Download the DBUNK App to submit your own fact-check requests for free and join a community dedicated to real, unbiased reporting.
Read the Original Article
For transparency, you can view the original article here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/watchdog-group-hits-letitia-james-bar-complaint-after-federal-judge-tosses-case
